Isn't the solution to AI in college (cheating) obvious?
| High-end Excitant Field | 05/15/25 | | fantasy-prone flirting water buffalo | 05/15/25 | | High-end Excitant Field | 05/15/25 | | twinkling kitchen brethren | 05/15/25 | | boyish chapel codepig | 05/15/25 | | startled jew | 05/16/25 | | cheese-eating locale | 05/16/25 | | Big Chest-beating Stead Faggot Firefighter | 05/15/25 | | High-end Excitant Field | 05/15/25 | | fantasy-prone flirting water buffalo | 05/15/25 | | High-end Excitant Field | 05/15/25 | | burgundy infuriating pit azn | 05/15/25 | | pink adulterous lettuce piazza | 05/15/25 | | blue boiling water | 05/15/25 | | bespoke stag film puppy | 05/15/25 | | blue boiling water | 05/15/25 | | High-end Excitant Field | 05/15/25 | | twinkling kitchen brethren | 05/15/25 | | bespoke stag film puppy | 05/15/25 | | Geriatric Motley Bbw | 05/15/25 | | wonderful elite center | 05/15/25 | | fluffy house kitty cat | 05/17/25 | | vigorous dead heaven fat ankles | 05/15/25 | | Big Chest-beating Stead Faggot Firefighter | 05/15/25 | | vibrant unhinged public bath shitlib | 05/15/25 | | wonderful elite center | 05/16/25 | | beady-eyed stage doctorate | 05/15/25 | | rough-skinned stain garrison | 05/15/25 | | wonderful elite center | 05/15/25 | | blue boiling water | 05/15/25 | | brilliant space selfie | 05/15/25 | | wonderful elite center | 05/16/25 | | cerebral spot national security agency | 05/16/25 | | High-end Excitant Field | 05/17/25 | | Big Chest-beating Stead Faggot Firefighter | 05/21/25 | | Wild Stirring Range | 05/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 15th, 2025 6:04 PM Author: High-end Excitant Field
I browsed r/professors after seeing it in another thread here and it's all about how students use AI all day long on their written assignments and lie about it, the ways that profs have of trying to catch them, and how there are no consequences due to the college admins.
Just use in-class written exams. The profs could even still coddle students with this method by offering 3 or 4 throughout the semester and dropping the worst one from an average.
This may not work for English lit where you traditionally had to write longer research papers but it could be used for almost every other major.
Thoughts?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2).#48934725) |
Date: May 15th, 2025 10:27 PM Author: brilliant space selfie
It's incredibly obvious that the solution needs to be:
1. In person testing
2. An understanding that it is acceptable to use AI on any take home assignments
And this obviously isn't new. People have been cheating on take home assignments for 100 years. At least with AI the people are doig the work themselves with tools that are availale to them instead of paying some freshman to do it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2).#48935498) |
 |
Date: May 16th, 2025 6:31 AM Author: wonderful elite center
“BUT DO we really want to repeat the mistakes of the past??? Timed tests are problematic and exclusionary!!!!”
They want to let the whole class write a take home vibes based opinion piece about how their truth is valid because they felt something once in March, but they also need to ensure no “AI” or “bad takes” are involved. Very concerning bind they are in right now. Very concerning indeed!
So now they’re sitting there in committee meetings clutching their syllabi like rosary beads, whispering about “pedagogical integrity” while quietly running GPT-4 through Grammarly in a second tab.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2).#48936038) |
Date: May 16th, 2025 3:53 PM Author: cerebral spot national security agency
It's the obvious solution, but here are the issues (and why it has not been implemented, yet):
(1) Unis/Colleges are highly beurocratic organizations akin to government agencies and act comparably slow / retarded.
(2) Faculty, especially tenured professors, are EXTREMLY resistant to any change. This kind of thing would need to be voted on by the faculty of the individual colleges / schools in most universities. Impossible to get the buy in.
(3) UGs don't yet have the laptop requirements for students that LSs have. Schools would be scared of shitlib blowback REQUIRING students to buy a laptop.
(4) That exam software is somewhat pricey and and school would have to pay for it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2).#48937466) |
|
|