The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Humphrey’s Executor joining Barbaro and Roe v. Wade in hell
| Magenta Crackhouse | 05/22/25 |
| Magenta Crackhouse | 05/22/25 |
| Magenta Crackhouse | 12/08/25 |
| doobsian chest-beating institution | 12/09/25 |
| wild kitty cat regret | 12/09/25 |
| Magenta Crackhouse | 12/09/25 |
| Wonderful sadistic cuck | 12/09/25 |
| Wonderful sadistic cuck | 12/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:08 PM Author: Magenta Crackhouse big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule HE without mentioning it and just pull the plug?"
https://x.com/WilliamBaude/status/1925671526390444089 |
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:42 PM Author: Magenta Crackhouse [taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.]
is this still a law bort? c'mon, man, Humphrey's Executor just bit the dust. |
|
Date: December 8th, 2025 11:04 PM Author: Magenta Crackhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49495612) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 5:58 AM Author: doobsian chest-beating institution Next up, 13th Amendment! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49495893) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 8:41 AM Author: wild kitty cat regret (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49496020) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: Magenta Crackhouse Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are told.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1998123030917341316 |
 |
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:52 AM Author: Wonderful sadistic cuck the cons have the right position on this, but i think this is going to wind up being a chaotic disaster. practically speaking, these phd dorks are the experts to whom (in many cases) we should probably defer, although i think the solution for that is going to be to gut federal agencies and minimize the power they have. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49496287) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:55 AM Author: Wonderful sadistic cuck also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think jackson was saying the president should have NO power to fire agency heads, just that the "for cause" removal protections should be upheld.
the answer to the question she poses, though, is obviously that if the president is putting people in positions who know nothing, that's the senate's job to prevent that (which they clearly haven't done if you look at trump's nominees but that's a different issue altogether). |