The "planes" struck by Ukraine were decoys. Otherwise we'd have full nuke launch
| passionate rose rigor | 06/01/25 | | effete ratface lodge | 06/01/25 | | passionate rose rigor | 06/01/25 | | vengeful selfie | 06/01/25 | | Razzle-dazzle useless spot yarmulke | 06/01/25 | | passionate rose rigor | 06/01/25 | | passionate rose rigor | 06/01/25 | | motley nursing home queen of the night | 06/01/25 | | Razzle-dazzle useless spot yarmulke | 06/01/25 | | Slate boltzmann | 06/01/25 | | passionate rose rigor | 06/01/25 | | Slate boltzmann | 06/01/25 | | passionate rose rigor | 06/01/25 | | Apoplectic concupiscible degenerate | 06/01/25 | | Lake doobsian bawdyhouse | 06/01/25 | | carmine karate | 06/01/25 | | passionate rose rigor | 06/01/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:29 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle useless spot yarmulke
It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber arm, and there's no reason to think that Ukraine won't be able to do exactly the same thing in 6 months. Or to go after all civilian air travel.
Can Putin get away with just ordering an (ineffective) Oreshnik strike in retaliation for this? Can he get away with it again next time when Ukraine does exactly the same thing again?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2).#48978887) |
|
|