1887 consuela trying to convince subsistence farmers they have it good
| nofapping irradiated travel guidebook toaster | 08/11/25 | | talking church building new version | 08/11/25 | | seedy beta coldplay fan church | 08/11/25 | | appetizing old irish cottage institution | 08/11/25 | | Anal rehab | 08/11/25 | | Galvanic turdskin | 08/11/25 | | Anal rehab | 08/11/25 | | appetizing old irish cottage institution | 08/11/25 | | appetizing old irish cottage institution | 08/11/25 | | talking church building new version | 08/11/25 | | appetizing old irish cottage institution | 08/11/25 | | nofapping irradiated travel guidebook toaster | 08/11/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 11th, 2025 3:15 PM Author: talking church building new version
Per Gore Vidal in Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, p. 61: “But Dyer has unearthed a genuine ongoing conspiracy that affects everyone in the United States. Currently, a handful of agro-conglomerates are working to drive America's remaining small farmers off their land by systematically paying them less for their produce than it costs to grow, thus forcing them to get loans from the conglomerates' banks, assume mortgages, and undergo foreclosures and the sale of land to corporate-controlled agribusiness. But is this really a conspiracy or just the Darwinian workings of an efficient marketplace? There is, for once, a smoking gun in the form of a blueprint describing how best to rid the nation of small farmers. Dyer writes: "In 1962, the Committee for Economic Development comprised approximately seventy-five of the nation's most powerful corporate executives. They represented not only the food industry but also oil and gas, insurance, investment and retail industries. Almost all groups that stood to gain from consolidation were represented on that committee. Their report [An Adaptive Program for Agriculture] outlined a plan to eliminate farmers and farms. It was detailed and well thought out." Simultaneously, "as early as 1964, congressmen were being told by industry giants like Pillsbury, Swift, General Foods, and Campbell Soup that the biggest problem in agriculture was too many farmers."....So a conspiracy has been set in motion to replace the Jeffersonian ideal of a nation whose backbone was the independent farm family with a series of agribusiness monopolies where, Dyer writes,"these companies controlled 96% of U.S. wheat exports, 95% of U.S. corn exports," and so on through the busy aisles of [grocery stores]. Has consolidation been good for the customers? By and large, no."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761162&forum_id=2,#49175361) |
|
|