The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| ultramarine degenerate knife | 01/06/26 | | Hyperactive generalized bond fortuitous meteor | 01/06/26 | | Violent stock car | 01/06/26 | | Hyperactive generalized bond fortuitous meteor | 01/06/26 | | Violent stock car | 01/06/26 | | Hyperactive generalized bond fortuitous meteor | 01/06/26 | | ultramarine degenerate knife | 01/06/26 | | Hyperactive generalized bond fortuitous meteor | 01/06/26 | | ultramarine degenerate knife | 01/06/26 | | cowardly provocative dilemma | 01/07/26 | | Cracking school | 01/06/26 | | Lavender locus athletic conference | 01/06/26 | | Violent stock car | 01/06/26 | | Passionate Pungent Parlour | 01/06/26 | | Violent stock car | 01/06/26 | | Bateful rehab quadroon | 01/06/26 | | embarrassed to the bone salmon becky home | 01/06/26 | | Narrow-minded motley dog poop | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Hyperactive generalized bond fortuitous meteor
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2,#49568134) |
|
|