ChatGPT is SPS for drafting legal documents, only useful for emails
| Crawly Box Office | 08/11/25 | | Beta Forum Skinny Woman | 08/11/25 | | Laughsome Fanboi | 08/11/25 | | Laughsome Fanboi | 08/11/25 | | Crawly Box Office | 08/11/25 | | Laughsome Fanboi | 08/11/25 | | Beta Forum Skinny Woman | 08/11/25 | | filthy aromatic ticket booth | 08/11/25 | | coral church building | 08/11/25 | | Laughsome Fanboi | 08/11/25 | | Beta Forum Skinny Woman | 08/11/25 | | Exhilarant orchestra pit | 08/11/25 | | Laughsome Fanboi | 08/11/25 | | Exhilarant orchestra pit | 08/11/25 | | Crawly Box Office | 08/11/25 | | coral church building | 08/11/25 | | Avocado idiot plaza | 08/11/25 | | Laughsome Fanboi | 08/11/25 | | Beta Forum Skinny Woman | 08/11/25 | | Avocado idiot plaza | 08/11/25 | | wild library | 08/11/25 | | Sepia indian lodge | 08/11/25 | | Laughsome Fanboi | 08/11/25 | | Sapphire pea-brained range | 08/11/25 | | bonkers pearl market french chef | 08/11/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 11th, 2025 3:12 PM Author: Beta Forum Skinny Woman
It is quite FAGGOT at doing any type of legal reasoning.
It's great at proofreading simple mistakes tho
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761174&forum_id=2,#49175350) |
 |
Date: August 11th, 2025 3:25 PM Author: Laughsome Fanboi
exactly.
it does an excellent job with isolated questions. especially if you want it create arguments for or against something. it's good to plug in stuff and say "create the best argument against this."
but it sucks at writing an entire thing. and it winds up costing time because you have to go through and find out what it hallucinated or fucked up. works best when tackling bite-sized issues and you just plugging it in yourself.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761174&forum_id=2,#49175398) |
 |
Date: August 11th, 2025 3:29 PM Author: coral church building
this
also every time I use it I make sure to come in with all of my case and statute citations beforehand (which I always did when writing a motion etc). However, even when spoon feeding it these things, it tends to paraphrase them too much or even occasionally misinterpret them. I also carefully write out my own facts. But if you feed it your facts, your direct citations and tell it not to paraphrase them, then feed it a general outline of your arguments and sub arguments (and even tell it to come up with additional ones that it sees as necessary), its a good starting place IMO
Did this today with a fairly pain in the ass motion to compel that I need to start on
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761174&forum_id=2,#49175412) |
 |
Date: August 11th, 2025 3:39 PM Author: Laughsome Fanboi
yeah, it gives a good start to a lot of things.
i have a session where i had to keep reinforcing *JUST DO GRAMMAR, SPELLING, ETC. DO NOT ALTER CONTENT* and it still fucked with shit sometimes. after a while it stopped.
it's like having an autistic paralegal. you can trust it to do some things really well but some things it will fuck up and you can never completely trust it. rainman, second year associate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761174&forum_id=2,#49175456) |
Date: August 11th, 2025 5:11 PM Author: bonkers pearl market french chef
really need to break things into small chunks, boyos
I crafted the perfect resume recently and 2x'd my salary in under 3 weeks. Each resume section and subsection was a 500+ word prompt that got refined and perfected into the end product, and cross referenced against deep research reporting. Being lazy with AI is not the answer.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761174&forum_id=2,#49175775) |
|
|