The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| geriatric lay | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy gunner puppy | 01/06/26 | | hot arrogant kitty cat | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy gunner puppy | 01/06/26 | | hot arrogant kitty cat | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy gunner puppy | 01/06/26 | | geriatric lay | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy gunner puppy | 01/06/26 | | geriatric lay | 01/06/26 | | Cerebral theater | 01/07/26 | | Translucent rebellious set athletic conference | 01/06/26 | | Citrine whorehouse | 01/06/26 | | hot arrogant kitty cat | 01/06/26 | | amber address coffee pot | 01/06/26 | | hot arrogant kitty cat | 01/06/26 | | exciting medicated theatre fat ankles | 01/06/26 | | Blue Elastic Band Church Building | 01/06/26 | | Hyperventilating trust fund hissy fit | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: internet-worthy gunner puppy
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2,#49568134) |
|
|