The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Costumed hunting ground | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious lime trailer park macaca | 01/06/26 | | Pea-brained vivacious background story kitchen | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious lime trailer park macaca | 01/06/26 | | Pea-brained vivacious background story kitchen | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious lime trailer park macaca | 01/06/26 | | Costumed hunting ground | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious lime trailer park macaca | 01/06/26 | | Costumed hunting ground | 01/06/26 | | sooty hell | 01/07/26 | | Free-loading jewess | 01/06/26 | | ocher marvelous filthpig degenerate | 01/06/26 | | Pea-brained vivacious background story kitchen | 01/06/26 | | French judgmental resort scourge upon the earth | 01/06/26 | | Pea-brained vivacious background story kitchen | 01/06/26 | | Topaz insane really tough guy | 01/06/26 | | contagious gunner | 01/06/26 | | sick gas station dysfunction | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: rambunctious lime trailer park macaca
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2,#49568134) |
|
|