Can Men Get Pregnant?
| Harsh friendly grandma theater stage | 05/04/22 | | thirsty lavender church | 05/04/22 | | Soul-stirring weed whacker lodge | 05/04/22 | | Abusive Cruel-hearted Meetinghouse | 05/04/22 | | Soul-stirring weed whacker lodge | 05/04/22 | | Abusive Cruel-hearted Meetinghouse | 05/04/22 | | Salmon charismatic new version bawdyhouse | 05/04/22 | | carnelian theater ratface | 05/04/22 | | thirsty lavender church | 05/04/22 | | awkward fuchsia pit | 05/04/22 | | bright dashing striped hyena | 01/14/26 | | bright dashing striped hyena | 01/14/26 | | bright dashing striped hyena | 01/15/26 | | bright dashing striped hyena | 01/15/26 | | bright dashing striped hyena | 01/19/26 | | nyuug | 01/20/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | cracking property | 01/14/26 | | insanely creepy main people | 01/15/26 | | vermilion razzle-dazzle french chef | 01/15/26 | | thriller stock car | 01/19/26 | | 6 7 | 01/25/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:28 PM Author: thirsty lavender church
"With our understanding constantly evolving, it’s important to honor the fact that one’s gender doesn’t determine whether they can become pregnant. Many men have had children of their own, and many more will likely do so in the future."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#44454608)
|
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:36 PM Author: Abusive Cruel-hearted Meetinghouse
“To our knowledge, there has not yet been a case of pregnancy in [a biologically male] individual.”
Is the “to our knowledge” qualifier really necessary here?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#44454641) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:18 PM Author: insanely creepy main people
Pregnancy via the abdominal cavity
It has also been suggested that it may be possible for AMAB folks to carry a baby in the abdominal cavity.
People have made this leap based on the fact that a very tiny percentage of eggs are fertilized outside of the uterus in what is known as an ectopic pregnancy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#49592650) |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:14 PM Author: vermilion razzle-dazzle french chef
why won't shitlibs testifying before congress and scotus say what they mean: "man" and "woman" is purely psychological, can be chosen and changed at will by the individual, and is not subject to review. it is objectively meaningless. but then it's an invalid class for the purpose of the law - if you can't define it you can't distinguish it, and if you can't distinguish it you can't protect it. next up: whites start identifying as black on college applications and government contracts.
and why don't republicans just steal their language and define "woman" as "a person with a uterus and ovaries"? or "a person with xx chromosomes?"
this shit is so silly. what a joke of a country.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#49592636) |
|
|