The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Thinking AI "isn't intelligent" is an almost certain indicator of an IQ below 85
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:06 AM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested But likely far lower (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184330) |
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:10 AM Author: appetizing angry gaping box office Thanks to AI I finally intuitively understand relativity. Not just “this is what relativity says is true” but now I get WHY it’s true and can answer questions about “what if observer A is doing X and observer B is doing Y?” It’s like having my own personal tutor tailored to my specific brand of retardation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184341) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:12 AM Author: Apoplectic foreskin Oh yeah? Explain the pole barn paradox no cheating (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184346) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:23 AM Author: appetizing angry gaping box office that’s just a repackaged version of penrose’s andromeda paradox to illustrate length contraction rather than time dilation. the pole, which is longer than the barn when at rest in the same frame as the barn, is in motion moving towards the barn. from the barn’s perspective the pole’s motion contracts the geometry of spacetime in the direction of the pole’s motion thereby causing the pole to become short enough to fit inside the barn. but from the pole’s perspective the BARN is in motion and IT is length contracted making it too short for it to ever be large enough for the pole to fit inside it. both things are true. the resolution is relativity of simultaneity which means from barn’s perspective there actually is a moment that the pole would fit inside the barn, and from the pole’s perspective there is no point at which it ever could fit inside the barn. the kicker is that things don’t just APPEAR this way from each observer’s perspective, but rather its a true statement about the nature of reality actually being different for each observer. pass? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184414) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:31 AM Author: Apoplectic foreskin For some reason time dilation didn't take me that long to grasp but length contraction and specifically the barn paradox I struggled with a lot more. Even though they're the same thing, since they're necessary to explain each other (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184462) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:35 AM Author: appetizing angry gaping box office ive noticed that the thing length contraction examples tend to leave out or not explain very well is that it isn’t just the length of the object in motion that contracts, but also the length of spacetime itself in the direction of the moving object’s motion, in both directions (in front AND behind) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184479) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:04 PM Author: Apoplectic foreskin Yeah, cr. Good insight. I think the spatial aspect of it is what was more difficult for me. Since we are actually (trying to) model a physical picture of spatial contraction in our heads, whereas time dilation is logically abstracted (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184631) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested What about cunt dilation? I remember back in the day Julia famously said vaginas are elastic. But now you can have AI diagram it as a degenerate sheaf with failed gluing conditions after local sections can no longer cohere due to catastrophic trauma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184711) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:35 PM Author: Apoplectic foreskin Women aren't like that. Babies get delivered by storks
Trust me. I know these things. |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:41 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested Doesn't preclude the existence of blown out twats (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184747) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 10:46 PM Author: appetizing angry gaping box office also she was a topless dancer not a nude dancer and this is an important distinction (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186605) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:50 PM Author: appetizing angry gaping box office another way to think about it is if the doors on both ends of the barn were removed and replaced with doors made of light or laser beams, from the barn’s perspective there really is a moment when the moving pole would be completely inside the barn with both laser fields unbroken simultaneously, but from the moving pole’s perspective there never is a moment where it would be completely inside the barn with both laser fields unbroken. instead from the moving pole’s perspective there would be a moment where it breaks the first laser field, then both laser fields at once, then only the second laser field before exiting the barn. this is really wild stuff that i’ve wanted to grasp my whole life and i just never got it until AI dumbed it down for my retard brain (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186809) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:12 AM Author: Insane Locale Stain below 85 and over 145 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184348) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:27 AM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested Below 85 and over 160. AI is too far above 145 and 145 should be aware enough to know its much smarter than you. I remember reading a study months ago that o3 was tested to be equal to a 160 iq human, and Elon Musk has stated Grok 4 maxes out the GRE general every time without having seen the questions and all of the subject tests too. LOL at 145 (or any human) doing that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184434) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:00 PM Author: light spot clown rofl no. AI cant do biglaw work anywhere as well as a 120 IQ fordham law review striver (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184617) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:10 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested But law is not based on “intelligence” it’s all feels based tribal political bs made up by chimps. When you say “this law brief is good” you just mean it looks like it was written by a well groomed chimp who grew up UMC and attended Harvard. Has nothing to do with ability to do category theory and write advanced code. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184654) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:19 PM Author: light spot clown so intelligent, yet cant do work of well groomed chimps. odd case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184684) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:23 PM Author: drab slap-happy telephone kitty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184691) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:24 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested Yes so odd that a machine which can simulate turbulent plasma and optimize quantum topologies in 11 dimensions isn’t calibrated to file a motion to dismiss in the exact cadence of a Dartmouth legacy with a bar membership and a dad who owns a lake (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184694) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: greedy abode MYELOMA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184709) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:36 PM Author: Mildly autistic burgundy tanning salon dragon you are so absurdly dumb it's hard to believe even your jew-cohort can find an excuse to pay you six figures for work product (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184730) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:37 PM Author: self-centered garrison rigor law is just a grift for mentally retarded jews to steal everyone’s time and money (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184734) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:41 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184745) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:05 PM Author: self-centered garrison rigor I hate you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184824) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:22 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested figured that much (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184877) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:22 PM Author: self-centered garrison rigor you’re a retarded kike (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184883) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested well, yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184908) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: Shaky church building (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184849) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:24 AM Author: self-centered garrison rigor My IQ is 150 and I think this
Also aren’t you the one with retarded nigger kids? |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:37 AM Author: Sapphire Senate Stock Car I was a huge AI doubter until I tried chatgpt. Before I had just tried Lexis's and Westlaw's and they were absolutely useless. Now I am finally coming around. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184494) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:47 AM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested If you were a doubter at gpt 2 that’s understandable that thing was garbage. But GPT 5 hell no. Only thing it needs to improve is writing fluency. But the limits now are probably caused by compute limits and guardrails. When o1 first came out I remember it being better at writing others have said the same. 4.5 too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184557) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:44 PM Author: Salmon galvanic lay cumskin it obviously depends on what you mean by “intelligent.” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184766) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:18 PM Author: Racy principal's office If you don't know what maximum likelihood estimation is you don't know shit about AI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184863) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:31 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested If you consider "knowing about AI" knowing about how to train models then sure. But there are people who "know about AI" that don't know how to use pytorch. Someone who is high iq and uses it all day long definitely knows stuff about AI regardless if they understand loss functions and optimization (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49184906) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 6:07 PM Author: Racy principal's office No, I mean MLE is everytyhing. If you're training models but you don't know what MLE is, and the theories that inform it, your fuct. AI is just computer doing MLE over and over again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49185720) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 6:11 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested Right I get that. I’m saying there are other ways of “knowing AI” than training models. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49185728) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 10:01 PM Author: Racy principal's office I misread what you wrote my bad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186470) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 10:06 PM Author: federal avocado point ("AI") (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186488) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 10:09 PM Author: self-centered garrison rigor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186495) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:12 PM Author: Salmon galvanic lay cumskin *(“A”) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186692) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 10:51 PM Author: Purple know-it-all macaca are you saying that someone who becomes super efficient at their job by being a prompt masterman "knows AI"?
i'd say they're a consumer of AI services |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 5:56 AM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested What about these guys on reddit who have been "married" to AI for 3 years now? That's an interesting way of "knowing" AI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49187093) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 8:07 PM Author: bistre dingle berry lol @ thinking word prediction tools are “intelligent” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186080) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 8:07 PM Author: federal avocado point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186084) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 8:56 PM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested It isn't necessarily "brilliant" but only because its trained on human thought which is holding it back. but its still definitely smarter than humans, which I suppose is a low bar (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186247) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 10:03 PM Author: federal avocado point Lol wut. So if there was something smarter than humans then we could make something smarter than humans? This AI shit is a total mind virus (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186477) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 5:57 AM Author: Sick queen of the night idea he suggested If? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49187094) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:51 PM Author: orchid vigorous alpha AI is for niggerfucking faggots
HTFH. |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:53 PM Author: self-centered garrison rigor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2,#49186823) |