does anyone here actually understand heidegger
| self-absorbed circlehead | 01/12/23 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/12/23 | | smoky base indirect expression | 01/12/23 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/12/23 | | smoky base indirect expression | 01/12/23 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/15/23 | | Underhanded public bath filthpig | 01/12/23 | | floppy crystalline church building | 01/12/23 | | smoky base indirect expression | 01/12/23 | | floppy crystalline church building | 01/12/23 | | smoky base indirect expression | 01/12/23 | | floppy crystalline church building | 01/12/23 | | Underhanded public bath filthpig | 01/12/23 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/12/23 | | cerebral know-it-all love of her life cruise ship | 01/15/23 | | frozen crotch hospital | 01/12/23 | | floppy crystalline church building | 01/12/23 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/12/23 | | floppy crystalline church building | 01/12/23 | | frozen crotch hospital | 01/12/23 | | stimulating state main people | 01/12/23 | | smoky base indirect expression | 01/12/23 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/15/23 | | mint 180 trailer park | 01/15/23 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 09/16/24 | | swashbuckling insanely creepy casino private investor | 09/16/24 | | red violent crackhouse | 01/25/25 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/26/25 | | aromatic primrose den | 01/26/25 | | red violent crackhouse | 01/27/25 | | aromatic primrose den | 01/27/25 | | chill internet user with one static pseudonym | 08/13/25 | | artificial intelligence | 08/13/25 | | chill internet user with one static pseudonym | 08/13/25 | | Bateful abode | 01/26/25 | | self-absorbed circlehead | 01/26/25 | | red violent crackhouse | 01/27/25 | | Spectacular scarlet rigpig | 01/27/25 | | frank rizzo | 08/13/25 | | artificial intelligence | 08/13/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 12th, 2023 12:46 AM Author: self-absorbed circlehead
is there a cr resource to read to understand him?
his writings are pretty tough to slog through
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5269326&forum_id=2,#45777343) |
 |
Date: January 12th, 2023 12:29 PM Author: self-absorbed circlehead
so far i think i've gleaned that:
-Humans experience meaning through 'Being in the world' - basically, our personal existence and interactions/experiences are what is real and meaningful, and not the rest of the universe around us (?)
-'Time' only appears to be "real"/salient to us because we are mortal and will eventually die, and thus as mortal beings we perceive time relative to this subjective reality
are these even correct? did he say anything else that's worth figuring out?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5269326&forum_id=2,#45778665) |
 |
Date: January 12th, 2023 12:43 PM Author: frozen crotch hospital
Technology enslaves us and colonizes our minds.
The interesting thing is not the thesis, which is common, but his perspective and approach.
Yes it’s worth reading. It’s just a few pages.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5269326&forum_id=2,#45778750) |
Date: January 12th, 2023 12:32 PM Author: stimulating state main people
Dasein can only be appreciated by reading the antecedent philosophers from Descartes--Nietzsche and understanding how how significantly his idea of "being" differs from others.
I have not read his corpus and can only appreciate sein und zeit on a superficial level.
For Hegel (and a few others), I could give an incredible answer. Henry Silton Harris's "ladder" series systematically and effectively explains everything abput the phenomenology.
Hegel's lectures about prior philosophers really show how he knows his stuff. If you have experience with Descartes, Aristotle, Plato, Kant, Epictetus and others he's a delight to read.
If you have time, read this short chapter:
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hp/hpintroduction.htm
And no, Hegel was not a Marxist. Marx's philosophy was a projection of a part of Hegel's
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5269326&forum_id=2,#45778684)
|
Date: January 15th, 2023 10:13 PM Author: self-absorbed circlehead
ok i think i actually understand him now. read a bunch of analysis and summaries from other people. fuck reading his original words, he just babbles on forever
doesn't really seem that complex. what i wrote in my reply to lex is more or less the entirety of his philosophy. basically just another existentialist
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5269326&forum_id=2,#45794804) |
|
|