Firm saves $8 million annually with an $8,000 AI tool
| ''"'''"''"''''"'' | 09/03/25 | | ''"'''"''"''''"'' | 09/03/25 | | Bob Rooney | 09/03/25 | | ''"'''"''"''''"'' | 09/03/25 | | Diamond Dallas Trump | 09/03/25 | | ''"'''"''"''''"'' | 09/03/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 3rd, 2025 1:21 PM Author: ''"'''"''"''''"''
How to develop tools like this?
The resource-allocation paradox
Enterprises are spending in the wrong places. Roughly half of gen-AI budgets flow to sales and marketing tools, where attribution is murky and uplift is hard to prove. The stronger returns, MIT finds, come from back-office automation: eliminating BPO contracts, cutting agency spend, and streamlining administrative work. One firm reportedly saved $8 million annually with an $8,000 tool. Quiet savings, real cash.
That mismatch explains the “looks great, pays late” problem. Front-office pilots produce glossy dashboards and exec demos. Back-office projects lack sizzle but drop costs fast. Most companies still optimize for visibility over verified value. Fixing that bias is the low-drama way to put AI on the income statement.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5769442&forum_id=2,#49233859) |
|
|