It isn't even that difficult. How do people like this even p...	metaepistemology is trans	12/21/25
...	metaepistemology is trans	12/23/25
yeah total construct, must be imagining that niggers are bla...	nude chinaman	12/23/25
Real talk, white people look weird as fuck and unnatural to ...	metaepistemology is trans	12/23/25
100% agree!!! Australian Aborigines = Taiwanese and German =...	Watcher in the Woods	12/23/25
Yes. Also 5 foot tall khosian clicking pygmy is same as 6 fo...	metaepistemology is trans	12/23/25
...	metaepistemology is trans	12/23/25
while psychotic bullshit, the "construct" is true ...	SkaddenArse	12/23/25
yeah thats close enough. although i'd argue khosians and abo...	metaepistemology is trans	12/23/25
Tell me again how much you love cock.	Yummy Phase Pol Pot	12/23/25
Even if it is a "social construct," it is obviousl...	Yummy Phase Pol Pot	12/23/25
well the social construct thing was meant to have multiple i...	metaepistemology is trans	12/23/25

Date: December 21st, 2025 8:36 PM Author: metaepistemology is trans It isn't even that difficult. How do people like this even pass college at all or get higher than 50th percentile on standardized tests (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49529009)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:39 AM Author: metaepistemology is trans (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533262)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:40 AM Author: nude chinaman yeah total construct, must be imagining that niggers are black as sin and white ppl look normal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533267)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:43 AM Author: metaepistemology is trans Real talk, white people look weird as fuck and unnatural to me now because of how uncommon they have become in media (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533281)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:48 AM Author: Watcher in the Woods 100% agree!!! Australian Aborigines = Taiwanese and German = Central African Republic. NBD! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533292)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:50 AM Author: metaepistemology is trans Yes. Also 5 foot tall khosian clicking pygmy is same as 6 foot 5 dutchman. We just interpret them differently. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533299)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 9:58 AM Author: metaepistemology is trans (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533451)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 10:00 AM Author: SkaddenArse while psychotic bullshit, the "construct" is true if you go back far enough. there are only 2 races - africans and everyone else. as africans never interbred with neanderthals they are a different species than the rest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533455)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 10:22 AM Author: metaepistemology is trans yeah thats close enough. although i'd argue khosians and abos are a different species as well. khosians diverged from modern humans like 100K years ago and interbred with stuff we don't even have a name for. and abos definitely have some weird shit in them too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533509)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 10:05 AM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot Tell me again how much you love cock. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533465)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 10:28 AM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot Even if it is a "social construct," it is obviously a useful one. And from reading your posts, it seems like your beef is that we should be referring to blacks and aboriginals as different species. That's all well and good, but is impractical day to day unless you want to start a "race" (species?) war. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533529)

Date: December 23rd, 2025 10:41 AM Author: metaepistemology is trans well the social construct thing was meant to have multiple interpretations. it could be read as being facetious (and saying of course its not just a social construct there are structural differences), or as me saying continental race theory truly is a social construct and doesn't represent the underlying genetic diversity. I suppose its useful? Except it gets blamed for "racism" and attacked as a colonialist-victorian white supremacist system, but yet those same people who attack it want to continually reinforce it and use it to give certain groups social welfare and demonize other groups. I don't understand how being honest about the underlying diversity would start a "race war" vs what we already have. Like I just pointed out, the system we have generates all kinds of controversy, both from people who agree with it and disagree with it. To me it is better to be honest about the underlying phenomena and map them in ways that actually correspond to nature. This is already done quietly in areas like medicine where you can't afford to tell fairy tales. The people worried it is impractical and will be misused and start a race war are usually just clinging to an emotionally satisfying narrative and have no idea what would actually result from being honest about the subject. I'm not saying we should talk about different "species" per se. The concept of species is already broken for domesticated animals where you see wildly divergent phenotypes across smaller genetic differences (and humans are domesticated). I'm just saying that maybe humans should study themselves in a way thats honest instead of reverting to outdated categories and then blaming it on being scared of racism? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5812902&forum_id=2,#49533570)