The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| galvanic church | 01/06/26 | | Balding parlor | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Gas Station | 01/06/26 | | Balding parlor | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Gas Station | 01/06/26 | | Balding parlor | 01/06/26 | | galvanic church | 01/06/26 | | Balding parlor | 01/06/26 | | galvanic church | 01/06/26 | | Bateful prole menage | 01/07/26 | | Bat-shit-crazy stimulating abode | 01/06/26 | | demanding location | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Gas Station | 01/06/26 | | pea-brained affirmative action | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Gas Station | 01/06/26 | | abnormal point twinkling uncleanness | 01/06/26 | | Greedy cobalt dog poop becky | 01/06/26 | | cruel-hearted range | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Balding parlor
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2,#49568134) |
|
|