Remember when libs forcememed "stochastic terrorism"?
| Canary irradiated school philosopher-king | 07/13/24 | | spruce glittery bawdyhouse | 07/13/24 | | Canary irradiated school philosopher-king | 07/13/24 | | ultramarine feces sanctuary | 07/13/24 | | Canary irradiated school philosopher-king | 07/13/24 | | tan marketing idea base | 02/19/25 | | buff resort generalized bond | 02/19/25 | | impressive point | 02/19/25 | | drab charismatic half-breed market | 07/01/25 | | Deranged translucent new version cuck | 07/01/25 | | rear naked choke | 09/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 13th, 2024 9:11 PM Author: Canary irradiated school philosopher-king
The theory is that if you say enough mean things about a person or group, it will eventually inspire some wacko to commit violence against that person or group. Therefore such mean speech is terrorism and should be punishable.
Over/under on length of time before libs have the stones to resurrect that argument?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5554984&forum_id=2,#47839351) |
Date: February 19th, 2025 2:02 AM Author: buff resort generalized bond
Trumpmos were all over this theory after the attempted assassination
They wouldn't let you criticize him because that would just be encouraging more violence
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5554984&forum_id=2,#48673592) |
|
|