Biglawyers: How is the culture now that p'ship isnt a realistic possibility?
| (*)> | 02/25/26 | | ....,,....,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.......,.,.,.,.,..,. | 02/25/26 | | Frutiger AeroEra was, is, & will be 180 (link) | 02/25/26 | | (*)> | 02/25/26 | | we are definitely claiming fraud trumpmos | 02/25/26 | | (*)> | 02/25/26 | | @grok, is this true? | 02/25/26 | | (*)> | 02/25/26 | | ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 02/25/26 | | Royce da 5'9 | 02/26/26 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 02/25/26 | | Frutiger AeroEra was, is, & will be 180 (link) | 02/25/26 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 02/25/26 | | Frutiger AeroEra was, is, & will be 180 (link) | 02/25/26 | | .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,...., | 02/25/26 | | Brussels Sprout: Brussels,Helsinki,Stockholm,Kyiv | 02/26/26 | | Royce da 5'9 | 02/26/26 | | richard clock | 02/25/26 | | norwood ultra | 02/25/26 | | (*)> | 02/25/26 | | @grok, is this true? | 02/25/26 | | norwood ultra | 02/25/26 | | (*)> | 02/25/26 | | norwood ultra | 02/25/26 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 02/26/26 | | JJC (retired) | 02/25/26 | | Royce da 5'9 | 02/26/26 | | ...:........;;.........,;:..........:.;....:::.... | 02/26/26 | | Royce da 5'9 | 02/26/26 | | norwood ultra | 02/26/26 | | Risten | 02/25/26 | | CapTTTainFalcon | 02/26/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 25th, 2026 2:17 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city)
presumably the culture of Partner rule through fear and associate subservience has abated now that the carrot has evaporated? the associates must realize they have zero incentive other than to maximize their own bonuses and earnings?
maybe some of the associate really, really need their jobs, but surely they realize they can make money lawyering many other places? it's just hard to see how the management and incentive model continues to work now that the rug has been pulled completely out from under
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49694603) |
Date: February 25th, 2026 2:33 PM
Author: ....,,....,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.......,.,.,.,.,..,.
Partnership is much more attainable than 15 years ago. Of course it’s all salaried non-equity bullshit though if you’re good but not equity material at least they’ll keep you around indefinitely at $600-700k rather than force you out at year ten.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49694655) |
 |
Date: February 25th, 2026 8:48 PM
Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,,
You're correct. I think that the average hours worked in big law is something like 1700 - thogh that's probably dragged down by people ramping up / ramping down.
But billing 1700 hours is way more work than your average 9-5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49695551) |
Date: February 25th, 2026 2:39 PM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
I work for my partner in a tiny niche specialty that he created that doesn't even exist in most biglaw firms, much less out on my own. Well, I guess I could try to leave and steal his clients, by my aspie, xo-reading ass wouldn't be able to steal a single client from his charismatic self. So I'm going to ride the gravy train as long as I can- it pays a lot and, best of all, most of the time we can just recycle old work and bill full price for it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49694674) |
 |
Date: February 25th, 2026 2:44 PM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
Ty, it could all be over fast if someone figures out how bad we are ripping companies off and starts undercutting us. My partner keeps me around because there's too much work for him to do by himself, but that could change.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49694685) |
 |
Date: February 25th, 2026 5:28 PM
Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,....,
Living the dream
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49695066) |
 |
Date: February 26th, 2026 9:33 AM
Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;
Post-ITE and especially by about 2015 or so Tech inhouse was seen as the goal for many over making partner in biglaw. It was paying as much or more than what senior associates made and you were set up with a clear career trajectory if you had a modicum of generic white collar social awareness. The only people who didn’t think this way were litfags and hardcore aspies like Tax dorks (and only the bottom half EQ most aspie ones because plenty of Tax people go inhouse). I gather this has normalized somewhat, but my class year and the 2-3 on either side are illustrative. I was at a v10 and literally everyone was inhouse by 2015 regardless of whether they got Latham’d or not. The one exception was this turbo striver girl who went to specialized midlaw after she was Latham’d and then firm hopped her way back to make partner at at v100 and then leave for a v50. She was also pretty hot and managed to stay reasonably thin and fuckable through having 3 kids, so she would’ve crushed if she’d gone inhouse for peak woke.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49696232) |
 |
Date: February 26th, 2026 12:38 PM Author: Royce da 5'9 ((zurich is stained))
yeah, firms are all over the place i think.
im at a midlaw firm now. i'm converting to equity effective 1/1/27 and just talked to the firm COO about what comp looks like. it's roughly 40% of your working attorney number and 20% of your originations. so on a $2m book, assuming $1.2m in revenue being collected off my billable hours, i'll make $880-900k. pretty good for a $2m book.
i was at baker hostetler, and they are black box on everything. i know a dood who also has a $2m book and he's making 700-750k.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5838318&forum_id=2,#49696817) |
|
|