Founding Fathers by Clique
| cowgod | 12/22/25 | | gibberish (?) | 12/22/25 | | Wes Scantlin | 12/22/25 | | cowgod | 12/23/25 | | barnabyjones | 12/22/25 | | cowgod | 12/23/25 | | the cathedral of light | 12/23/25 | | barnabyjones | 12/23/25 | | the cathedral of light | 12/23/25 | | barnabyjones | 12/23/25 | | cowgod | 12/23/25 | | barnabyjones | 12/23/25 | | ....,.,.;;;,.,,:,.,.,::,.....,:,..,.. | 12/23/25 | | cowgod | 12/23/25 | | Candy Ride | 12/23/25 | | cowgod | 12/23/25 | | Candy Ride | 12/23/25 | | dadgummit | 12/23/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 22nd, 2025 10:10 PM Author: cowgod
George Washington — Prep/Jock
Alexander Hamilton — Loser
James Madison — Prep
Gouverneur Morris — Prep
James Wilson — Loser
John Jay — Prep
Thomas Jefferson — Prep
John Adams — Loser
Benjamin Franklin — Nerd
Samuel Adams — Loser
Patrick Henry — Loser
Thomas Paine — Low Loser
Nathanael Greene — Loser
Henry Knox — Nerd
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2:#49532774) |
 |
Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:30 AM Author: cowgod
Francis Marion was a High Loser who commanded an irregular army of Scumbags. Marion’s men were not produced by the Revolution, they were exposed by it. Clique Theory orthodoxy holds that Scumbags exist prior to ideology and become operational when hierarchy loosens, and the Carolina swamps functioned as a solvent that stripped away residual restraint. These were bodies already trained by deprivation, dampness, and casual violence, for whom liberty was not an idea but a temporary suspension of consequence. Scumbags do not metabolize abstraction, they respond to permission, grievance, and proximity to force. The swamp rewarded endurance, disappearance, and predation while dissolving discipline, paperwork, and permanence. Marion did not reform this material, orthodoxy forbids reform, he merely vectored it outward through scarcity, silence, and selective tolerance. Violence was not condemned, it was aimed. The effectiveness of the force derived from its incompatibility with institutions. When the republic congealed into law, property, and legibility, these bodies became excess matter. History then performed sanitation, recoding Scumbags as rustic patriots, preserving the myth while erasing the mechanism.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2:#49533244) |
 |
Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:18 AM Author: cowgod
In a 1807 letter to Benjamin Rush, Adams listed Washington’s “talents” in a way that is clearly sarcastic about what made him admired: focusing on looks, height, and fortune rather than intellect or learning:
Adams described Washington’s qualities as including a “handsome Face,” a “tall Stature,” “elegant Form,” and “graceful Attitudes and Movement,” then concluded without mentioning reading, thinking, or writing — implicitly mocking the idea that Washington’s greatness came from intellect.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2:#49533237)
|
 |
Date: December 23rd, 2025 11:06 AM Author: cowgod
Paine’s published “Letter to George Washington” of 1796:
You knew enough of my character to be assured that I could not have deserved imprisonment in France, and without knowing anything more than this you had sufficient ground to have taken some interest for my safety.
Every motive arising from recollection of times past ought to have suggested to you the propriety of such a measure.
But I cannot find that you have so much as directed any enquiry to be made whether I was in prison or at liberty, dead or alive…
In the progress of events you beheld yourself a President in America and me a prisoner in France. You folded your arms, forgot your friend, and became silent.
…you have not served America with more disinterestedness, or greater zeal, or more fidelity, than myself…
…you rested at home to partake of the advantages.
As everything I have been doing in Europe was connected with my wishes for the prosperity of America, I ought to be the more surprised at this conduct…
…the presence of a man who might disapprove, and who had credit enough with the Country to be heard and believed, was not wished for…
This was the operating motive…
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2:#49533658) |
Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:25 AM
Author: ....,.,.;;;,.,,:,.,.,::,.....,:,..,..
no scumbags?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2:#49533240) |
 |
Date: December 23rd, 2025 11:26 AM Author: cowgod
James Madison was born into wealth, land, and inherited authority, a Prep calibrated before thought. Clique Theory reads this clearly: pedigree, property, and social networks are primary signals, not adornments. He did not hustle for prestige, pen letters to insist on virtue, or plead for recognition. He moved within elite structures preordained to receive him, drafting the Constitution, engineering compromise, and writing the Federalist Papers with quiet authority. Compare this to John Adams, a man of modest birth, constantly performing, anxious to claim his station, forever trying to assert relevance; the archetypal Loser energy. Madison’s power was structural, inherited, and effortlessly exercised, Adams’s was scrabbling, visible, and contingent. Whereas Adams wrote, argued, and campaigned for recognition, Madison built the framework upon which republics operate, invisible yet indispensable. In Clique Theory terms, wealth and pedigree convert Madison’s Prep energy into permanent influence; he did not need to try, and history rewarded him accordingly imho.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2:#49533755) |
|
|