\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but th...
Slate indian lodge
  12/06/25
I wouldn't.
vivacious insecure spot
  12/06/25
great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really&quo...
frozen locale
  12/06/25
Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"
vivacious insecure spot
  12/06/25
...
floppy topaz therapy
  12/06/25
pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and y...
splenetic location gay wizard
  12/06/25
People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge to...
Slate indian lodge
  12/06/25
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including ...
splenetic location gay wizard
  12/06/25
...
Disgusting mad-dog skullcap
  12/06/25
...
Disgusting mad-dog skullcap
  12/06/25
use "unserious" instead
Appetizing fortuitous meteor fanboi
  12/06/25
could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs
frozen locale
  12/06/25
Nonsensical
vivacious insecure spot
  12/06/25
"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"
Olive bipolar becky coffee pot
  12/06/25
"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g...
splenetic location gay wizard
  12/06/25
"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh w...
Olive bipolar becky coffee pot
  12/06/25
that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. b...
splenetic location gay wizard
  12/07/25
Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no be...
Olive bipolar becky coffee pot
  12/07/25
Seems cheap
Apoplectic wagecucks garrison
  12/06/25
wacky
Abnormal striped hyena
  12/06/25
finna make shiz up
vivacious insecure spot
  12/06/25
“trooned out”
unholy athletic conference church
  12/06/25
frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specio...
free-loading principal's office
  12/06/25
the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr
splenetic location gay wizard
  12/06/25
Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat ou...
Slate indian lodge
  12/06/25
Drop a few "Not so."s.
silver slippery persian
  12/06/25
"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."
Beady-eyed learning disabled mexican
  12/06/25
...
Slate indian lodge
  12/06/25
"nigger"
Mahogany Philosopher-king Piazza
  12/07/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: Slate indian lodge

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but that seems clearly over the line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488467)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:32 PM
Author: vivacious insecure spot

I wouldn't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488479)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: frozen locale

great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really" silly, or perhaps "super" silly so they dont get confused.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488493)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: vivacious insecure spot

Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488503)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:46 PM
Author: floppy topaz therapy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488525)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: splenetic location gay wizard

pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and you look worse to the court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488501)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:47 PM
Author: Slate indian lodge

People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge too far.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488531)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM
Author: splenetic location gay wizard

bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."

there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.

tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488562)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:20 PM
Author: Disgusting mad-dog skullcap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488652)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: Disgusting mad-dog skullcap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488646)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:48 PM
Author: Appetizing fortuitous meteor fanboi

use "unserious" instead

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488536)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: frozen locale

could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488556)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:58 PM
Author: vivacious insecure spot

Nonsensical

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488565)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:02 PM
Author: Olive bipolar becky coffee pot

"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49489724)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: splenetic location gay wizard

"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g. fundamental case that every idiot knows).

recently ACB cited marbury when addressing a KTJ dissent that was absolutely ruthless. that's far more effective and devasting than saying "KTJ's dissent is silly." don't say it's silly, show why it's silly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488570)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:03 PM
Author: Olive bipolar becky coffee pot

"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh when people say that. it could mean a million things. u saying they got the law wrong? applied the facts to the law wrong? etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49489727)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: splenetic location gay wizard

that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. but itt we don't know why candy ride thinks OCs argument is silly so a catch-all is appropriate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49491128)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: Olive bipolar becky coffee pot

Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no better than silly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49491145)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:01 PM
Author: Apoplectic wagecucks garrison

Seems cheap

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:17 PM
Author: Abnormal striped hyena

wacky

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488636)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:18 PM
Author: vivacious insecure spot

finna make shiz up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488642)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: unholy athletic conference church

“trooned out”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488651)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: free-loading principal's office

frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specious, unsupported by precedent or statute, and should be afforded no weight by the court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488669)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: splenetic location gay wizard

the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49488673)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:23 PM
Author: Slate indian lodge

Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat out wrong"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49489067)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:27 PM
Author: silver slippery persian

Drop a few "Not so."s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49489083)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:28 PM
Author: Beady-eyed learning disabled mexican

"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49489090)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:33 PM
Author: Slate indian lodge



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49489103)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:26 AM
Author: Mahogany Philosopher-king Piazza

"nigger"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2:#49491178)