XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/04/25 | | Fluffy locale wagecucks | 07/04/25 | | Cerise Concupiscible Location | 07/04/25 | | pea-brained nursing home | 07/04/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/04/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/04/25 | | Fluffy locale wagecucks | 07/04/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/04/25 | | Fluffy locale wagecucks | 07/04/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/04/25 | | Fluffy locale wagecucks | 07/05/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/05/25 | | Irate telephone jew | 07/05/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/06/25 | | Irate telephone jew | 07/05/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/05/25 | | Irate telephone jew | 07/06/25 | | Scarlet Coiffed Theater Stage Private Investor | 07/06/25 | | sable gaping | 07/05/25 | | slap-happy violet police squad chapel | 07/06/25 | | sable gaping | 07/06/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/06/25 | | sable gaping | 07/06/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/06/25 | | deranged opaque rehab | 07/05/25 | | Haunting Potus | 07/06/25 | | aggressive mood | 07/05/25 | | Impertinent Roast Beef Death Wish | 07/06/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/06/25 | | dashing crimson goyim mad-dog skullcap | 07/06/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/06/25 | | naked forum | 07/06/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/06/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/06/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/06/25 | | Scarlet Coiffed Theater Stage Private Investor | 07/06/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/06/25 | | slap-happy violet police squad chapel | 07/06/25 | | boyish nubile weed whacker azn | 07/06/25 | | dashing crimson goyim mad-dog skullcap | 07/06/25 | | Haunting Potus | 07/06/25 | | Adventurous red people who are hurt | 07/06/25 | | Learning disabled duck-like water buffalo | 07/06/25 | | thriller rambunctious cuckoldry | 07/06/25 | | stimulating awkward haunted graveyard state | 07/06/25 | | thriller rambunctious cuckoldry | 07/06/25 | | Passionate parlour | 07/06/25 | | sable gaping | 07/06/25 | | Talented Vermilion Property | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Adventurous red people who are hurt
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Adventurous red people who are hurt
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Adventurous red people who are hurt
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Adventurous red people who are hurt
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Impertinent Roast Beef Death Wish
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Scarlet Coiffed Theater Stage Private Investor
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Haunting Potus
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076800) |
|
|