Which country would you im.igrate if you could work abroad??
| Swashbuckling whorehouse | 05/24/25 | | filthy multi-billionaire | 05/24/25 | | Swashbuckling whorehouse | 05/24/25 | | Bossy sound barrier lay | 05/25/25 | | Cordovan racy ticket booth knife | 05/24/25 | | Swashbuckling whorehouse | 05/24/25 | | shimmering chest-beating tanning salon toaster | 05/25/25 | | Geriatric orange voyeur | 05/24/25 | | spruce native gaping | 05/24/25 | | Swashbuckling whorehouse | 05/25/25 | | spruce native gaping | 05/25/25 | | hot spectacular chad | 05/24/25 | | Geriatric orange voyeur | 05/24/25 | | Internet-worthy multi-colored corn cake | 05/25/25 | | federal vermilion nursing home | 05/24/25 | | Geriatric orange voyeur | 05/24/25 | | Lascivious Smoky Center Becky | 05/25/25 | | Swashbuckling whorehouse | 05/25/25 | | Lascivious Smoky Center Becky | 05/25/25 | | Swashbuckling whorehouse | 05/25/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: May 25th, 2025 4:59 PM Author: spruce native gaping
No, it's more than that. Even a 2% wealth tax is ruinous and makes UMC self-funded retirement essentially impossible.
Suppose you want $150,000 pre-income tax yearly in retirement. At a safe withdrawal rate of 3%, you need a portfolio of $5 million. If there is a wealth tax of 2%, that uses up all but 1% of your safe withdrawal rate, so your new minimum portfolio is $150,000 / 1%, or $15 million. Essentially a 2% wealth tax triples the amount you need to save for retirement.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5729556&forum_id=2],#48961034)
|
|
|