Traitor Tim Walz getting booed at the MN Capitol is LOL (video)
| FUCK LIBS | 01/04/26 | | sealclubber | 01/04/26 | | Gay Factory | 01/04/26 | | FUCK LIBS | 01/04/26 | | sealclubber | 01/04/26 | | FUCK LIBS | 01/04/26 | | sealclubber | 01/04/26 | | FUCK LIBS | 01/05/26 | | sealclubber | 01/05/26 | | FUCK LIBS | 01/05/26 | | sealclubber | 01/05/26 | | FUCK LIBS | 01/05/26 | | the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) | 01/05/26 | | sealclubber | 01/05/26 | | Quality Learing Center alumnus | 01/05/26 | | we are definitely claiming fraud trumpmos | 01/04/26 | | Rampart | 01/04/26 | | FUCK LIBS | 01/05/26 | | sealclubber | 01/05/26 | | screenman | 01/05/26 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 01/04/26 | | Mister Yak | 01/05/26 | | screenman | 01/05/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 4th, 2026 5:38 PM Author: sealclubber
it's not.
while walz will not engage in honest debate, let him say what he's going to say because people are there to hear him, not the heckler.
you apparently want it both ways--libs get to interrupt conservatives and vice versa. that's a shit take.
there are effective ways to deal with a dishonest broker
such as walz
being a douchebag is not effective, nor productive.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5817229&forum_id=2],#49562203) |
 |
Date: January 5th, 2026 11:04 AM Author: FUCK LIBS (TDNW)
yes, when people are clearly the enemy within the least we can do is heckle them
you think it’s a coincidence that Traitor Tim quit the race after people kept driving by his house screaming “retard” and then this public heckling? it lets these freaks know we are onto them
and Traitor Tim is out, no thanks to your cuckery
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5817229&forum_id=2],#49563695) |
 |
Date: January 5th, 2026 3:52 AM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.)
Nah, libs tend to be able to utilize emotional public speaking events better than cons, so I'm fine with the institution being destroyed (or more realistically, crippled) entirely, for both sides, since that ultimately inures to cons' benefit.
Btw, the same thing is true of the filibuster, the blue slip, and legislative gridlock in general -- obviously it sucks to have power and have a totally broken Congress, but on balance (i.e., summing together the detriments of a worthless congress when it's cons with the benefits of a worthless congress when it's libs), it's a net benefit that the institution just be destroyed for everyone. I presume you support the filibuster, though, because it has inertia, whereas you're not used to an Absolute heckler's veto on all public speech yet. But you'll get there.
What's funny is that if there's ever a really GREAT con leader/movement, it can have public speaking back anyway, by just beating/killing those who would interrupt.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5817229&forum_id=2],#49563297) |
 |
Date: January 5th, 2026 10:36 AM Author: sealclubber
so you'd rather destroy the first amendment than adapt because...durr durr benefit?
political gamesmanship is what it is. libs tend to exercise their power much more aggressively and recklessly, but cons have their moments-garland. i think the filibuster serves an important purpose. letting a party go hog wild because one vote is not worth the benefits, imo.
sure. funny.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5817229&forum_id=2],#49563634)
|
Date: January 4th, 2026 5:55 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
what a clownshow he is.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5817229&forum_id=2],#49562228) |
|
|