the popular perception of money's value changes asymmetrically
| bat shit crazy meetinghouse becky | 07/03/16 | | Buff party of the first part location | 07/03/16 | | bat shit crazy meetinghouse becky | 07/04/16 | | Arousing fluffy marketing idea | 07/04/16 | | bat shit crazy meetinghouse becky | 07/04/16 | | bat-shit-crazy property | 07/04/16 | | Arousing fluffy marketing idea | 07/04/16 | | Fiercely-loyal corner | 07/04/16 | | Arousing fluffy marketing idea | 07/04/16 | | bat-shit-crazy property | 07/04/16 | | i gave my cousin head | 08/03/25 | | Fiercely-loyal corner | 07/04/16 | | mischievous saffron pocket flask | 07/04/16 | | bat shit crazy meetinghouse becky | 07/04/16 | | mentally impaired toilet seat shitlib | 07/04/16 | | gram parsons | 08/06/25 | | cowgod (retired) | 08/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 3rd, 2016 1:31 AM Author: bat shit crazy meetinghouse becky
i was watching a rerun of Mary Tyler Moore, and Mary's 1973 salary of $225/week was scoffed at as being a fairly paltry wage. the joke was that Mary couldn't afford to buy a nice gift for someone on her low wage.
but then i looked it up on Inflation Calculator.gov, and the adjusted number is like $225/week in 1973 = $1,300/week in 2016.
that's not exactly a laughable 'office girl' wage that you could build a sitcom joke around nowadays.
the popular perception of the value of $225/$1,300 has changed, but not in a linear way.
in some strange way, 'a hundred bucks' still has the same psychological value that 'a hundred bucks' had in 1973.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2],#30841735) |
Date: July 3rd, 2016 1:37 AM Author: Buff party of the first part location
This coincides with our descent into 3rd world shithole status. There are serious adult men with engineering degrees and 7" cocks working 50 hours a week who randomly don't even make $1300 a week because, "fuck the American worker" plus ITE.
We're all conditioned to think that small amounts of money are a king's ransom, probably by CorpGovMedia. Like if you make $50k and live like a miser in Omaha you still can't really afford anything. You can afford to pay bills, if you're miserly maybe you can keep paying the bills for a while if you get suddenly canned by global capitalism. And you're right, people think that $100 is a lot of money in certain contexts. Like if you carry $300 in your wallet, people will think you're a criminal/mafioso. Meanwhile, a Mustang was like $1,999 back then. The only reason the working class can drive to work is because 17 year old F-150s are reliable and cost $3995.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2],#30841757) |
Date: July 4th, 2016 3:43 PM Author: bat shit crazy meetinghouse becky
cleaning out my mom's garage, i found a receipt for a basketball that my father bought in 1975.
the price? $49.95.
now, "$49.95" seems like exactly the price you might pay for a nice basketball in 2016. it really does. it seems like you would walk into a sporting goods store and $49.95 is *exactly* what you would expect to pay for a decent indoor basketball.
AND YET. when i punched the price into the inflation calculator, I discovered that the inflation adjusted price in 2016 dollars is -- a whopping **$223.27!!!**
how is this possible?
do you see what i mean by the asymmetry here? it's like some things inflate, while others do not. but that doesn't make sense. it's like magic.
it's a sim glitch.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2],#30850947) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2016 3:51 PM Author: Fiercely-loyal corner
yup.
i had a subscription to GamePro for years and i never got over how NeoGeo games were like $150 or whatever.
to this day i've never known a person that owned a NeoGeo. i always wanted to play one so bad. Their versions of Street Fighter and Samurai Showdown looked so fucking badass.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2],#30850992) |
Date: July 4th, 2016 3:55 PM Author: mentally impaired toilet seat shitlib
The $20 gold coins with about an ounce of gold in them are worth $1,350 now. Is $100 in 1920 worth $6,750 today? You tell me.
http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/20s-homes.html
Most of this asymmetry is due to technology, offshoring and government interference in markets.
Also there is no good way to measure inflation because of this.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2],#30851020) |
|
|