Explain the argument Trump’s lawyer is making here
| The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/20/25 | | VoteRepublican | 07/20/25 | | portnoy's BJC | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | portnoy's BJC | 07/21/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | buttfaggot | 07/20/25 | | CapTTTainFalcon | 07/20/25 | | MAGA Farm Animals Reeking of Trump Cologne | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | MAGA Farm Animals Reeking of Trump Cologne | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 | | UN peacekeeper | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 | | The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/20/25 | | ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 07/20/25 | | The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/20/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/20/25 | | The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/21/25 | | The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/21/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/21/25 | | The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/21/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/21/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 | | The Mysterious Jeffrey | 07/21/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/21/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,,
This is a dumb Tweet and a dumb thread.
They're trying to show that the libel was spread not just among the WSJ subscribers, but to hundreds of millions of people.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2],#49116437) |
 |
Date: July 20th, 2025 4:47 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
If you interpret "exclusive" to mean subscribers-only, then the fact that it was widely disseminated might reflect to intent to make it more broadly known. However I've always interpreted it to mean "only we have this info," which a media org often does with articles it runs paywall-free. They serve as advertising for the publication sometimes.
I also think a lot of stuff gets published paywall-free when it's just really important. Like when the NY times was reporting about Trump bombing Iran, I believe all of it was paywall-free. The WSJ would presumably do that if it had something exclusive and with that level of significance. They made a lot of shit paywall-free when Flynn went down in 2017. Their ukraineshit is sometimes paywall-free
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2],#49116932) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: OldHLSDude
My understanding is that in journalism "exclusive" means that you're the only news outlet who has access to the information and the right to publish it. I don't know if they paywalled this or not. I have WSJ and NYT subscriptions, so everything just opens up automatically.
Exclusivity is possibly a piece of the argument establishing actual malice. If no other news sources carried the information it erases the possibility of an "everybody is saying it" defense and any potential reliance the fact checking by other entities. I just skimmed the complaint.
I am forced to admire Trump's pugilistic spirit. I had an alpha dog like that once. He never took shit from any other dog and was a great inspiration.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2],#49118653) |
|
|