Biglaw salary over time
| .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::..,.,:,.,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 05/20/25 | | Drunkard | 05/20/25 | | ,,,..,,.......,,.... | 05/20/25 | | Nazca Redlines | 05/20/25 | | ~~(> ' ' )> | 05/20/25 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 05/20/25 | | cowgod | 05/20/25 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 05/20/25 | | ,,,..,,.......,,.... | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | Nazca Redlines | 05/20/25 | | indian rage in its purest form | 05/20/25 | | ;,;.;,.,;,.,;,;,.; | 05/20/25 | | ;,;.;,.,;,.,;,;,.; | 05/20/25 | | Kenneth Play | 05/20/25 | | Nazca Redlines | 05/20/25 | | disco fries | 05/20/25 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | cowgod | 05/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 05/20/25 | | disco fries | 05/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 05/20/25 | | disco fries | 05/20/25 | | Charles Tyrwhitt Dad | 05/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | but at what cost | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | theranchman | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | NeilArmstrong | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | tarrifs | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | Kenneth Play | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | CapTTTainFalcon | 05/20/25 | | blow off some steam | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | but at what cost | 05/20/25 | | NeilArmstrong | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | Wang Hernandez | 05/20/25 | | Gefilte Fish Vindaloo | 05/20/25 | | Noah Tannebaum | 05/20/25 | | indian rage in its purest form | 05/20/25 | | female penis | 05/20/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 05/20/25 | | disco fries | 05/21/25 | | Noah Tannebaum | 05/20/25 | | Wang Hernandez | 05/20/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 20th, 2025 4:00 PM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::..,.,:,.,.:.,:.,:.::,.
2007 to 2015: 160k
2016 to 2017: 180k
2018 to 2020: 190k
2021: 205k
2022 to 2023: 215k
2024 to 2025: 225k
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48948216)
|
 |
Date: May 20th, 2025 4:57 PM
Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;
97-2005 was 125k, Irell and Quinn went to 135 in 2005, big salary war was 2007 that culminated in NY to 160. The crazy thing is the WSGR led jump to 125k in 97. Before that white shoe NYC firms were under 100k.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48948399) |
 |
Date: May 20th, 2025 5:23 PM
Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;
*leans into mic*
While they eventually had to develop/attach to a large book in the 2010s, Gen Xers in biglaw got a much easier path to partnership and got to be wizards of efficiency as juniors and mid levels as long as they could operate basic word processing software. I worked at two v10s in the 00s and both were lousy with Gen Xers in their late 30s/early 40s who never would’ve been recruited as associates by the standards the firm had in the 00s, were generally at best mediocre lawyers, and who have carved out comfy little spots as protected service partners for big swinging dick boomers. They were about the only lawyers at the firms being paid in rough proportion to their market value and productivity.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48948474) |
Date: May 20th, 2025 4:03 PM Author: indian rage in its purest form ((zurich is stained))
poop on my penis
not flame
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48948230) |
Date: May 20th, 2025 4:10 PM Author: ;,;.;,.,;,.,;,;,.;
Now do V50, V25, V10 PPP and RPL over the same period and get ready to laugh your ass off.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48948245) |
 |
Date: May 20th, 2025 5:18 PM
Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;
I don’t have hard data to back this up, but my clear memory is that by 2007 they knew they were overhiring and were blatantly looking at half of each class of juniors as expendable and likely to be gone in three years, and then ITE happened and pulled that timeline in significantly. The other consequence of ITE is that the firms realized 1) that they paid no penalty with clients or schools/students for the layoffs, and 2) partners with large books were all that mattered to maintaining overall firm health/financials. So the last 15 years has effectively been a war among firms for books at least as large as the 30th largest book they currently have, and every other expense including other partners’ draws should be subservient to the goal of poaching as many big books as possible.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48948463) |
Date: May 20th, 2025 5:36 PM Author: female penis
Most people in biglaw last 3-5 years, pay off their $300k in school debt, and leave.
The small proportion who stay beyond year 5 will never make equity partner. Life can still be objectively “good” for them while it lasts but as long as they lack a book it is always precarious—they’re always at risk of being pushed out even with the rise of permanent nonequity positions.
Biglaw in the last 20 years has become a giant pyramid scheme, that’s it. As someone else noted above, the top 1% (I’ll be generous and say 5-10%) of biglaw is getting very, very rich. For everyone else, it’s materially worse now vs 20 years ago.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48948529) |
 |
Date: May 20th, 2025 9:57 PM Author: female penis
There are not lots of those people. Those days are over.
There were more equity service partners like you're describing (maybe they were making $1m instead of $2m) 10 years ago than there are now. Firms rely on permanent non-equity / of counsel to act as service partners in that capacity. If you get equity, especially with where PPP is now and given how most firms are on some version of eat what you kill, you are expected to generate business, constantly, not just service existing clients.
Like I said there are exceptions. If you're some super skilled superstar who does long-term good work for major institutional clients, even if you don't have a book, you can sometimes grind your way into equity especially if you threaten to leave. Even then part of your promotion will be your perceived capacity in the future to generate business even as you maintain the institutional relationships. I've also seen it happen where the person is a lieutenant for a BSD rainmaker who goes to bat for them. But these are atypical situations bro. Partnerships are cheap as fuck and they do not want to pay $2m a year simply to service matters when they can get that same work done for $500k a year.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5727948&forum_id=2],#48949590) |
|
|