XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/04/25 | | ruby chapel | 07/04/25 | | Avocado kitchen friendly grandma | 07/04/25 | | Motley dull weed whacker | 07/04/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/04/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/04/25 | | ruby chapel | 07/04/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/04/25 | | ruby chapel | 07/04/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/04/25 | | ruby chapel | 07/05/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/05/25 | | Crystalline Affirmative Action Private Investor | 07/05/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/06/25 | | Crystalline Affirmative Action Private Investor | 07/05/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/05/25 | | Crystalline Affirmative Action Private Investor | 07/06/25 | | Aromatic library | 07/06/25 | | Submissive boltzmann | 07/05/25 | | Hideous dark nowag box office | 07/06/25 | | Submissive boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/06/25 | | Submissive boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/06/25 | | frisky institution stock car | 07/05/25 | | saffron shitlib ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | Splenetic Jet Water Buffalo | 07/05/25 | | umber school | 07/06/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/06/25 | | Flickering Field Factory Reset Button | 07/06/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/06/25 | | unholy insanely creepy filthpig | 07/06/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/06/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/06/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/06/25 | | Aromatic library | 07/06/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/06/25 | | Hideous dark nowag box office | 07/06/25 | | ivory boyish idea he suggested | 07/06/25 | | Flickering Field Factory Reset Button | 07/06/25 | | saffron shitlib ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | charismatic chad business firm | 07/06/25 | | vengeful international law enforcement agency indian lodge | 07/06/25 | | awkward area dog poop | 07/06/25 | | Useless poppy half-breed | 07/06/25 | | awkward area dog poop | 07/06/25 | | Bateful Step-uncle's House Goal In Life | 07/06/25 | | Submissive boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | Comical jade crackhouse circlehead | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: charismatic chad business firm
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: charismatic chad business firm
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: charismatic chad business firm
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: charismatic chad business firm
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: umber school
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Aromatic library
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: saffron shitlib ladyboy
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076800) |
|
|