You guys have a lot to say about Jackson’s opinion but what about Soto’s dis
| Obsidian locus mexican | 06/30/25 | | elite tanning salon | 06/30/25 | | 180 internal respiration | 06/30/25 | | mind-boggling slippery puppy casino | 06/30/25 | | peach cuckoldry indian lodge | 06/30/25 | | bisexual medicated faggot firefighter | 06/30/25 | | elite tanning salon | 06/30/25 | | bisexual medicated faggot firefighter | 06/30/25 | | elite tanning salon | 06/30/25 | | bisexual medicated faggot firefighter | 06/30/25 | | elite tanning salon | 06/30/25 | | Startling abusive lodge psychic | 06/30/25 | | peach cuckoldry indian lodge | 06/30/25 | | bisexual medicated faggot firefighter | 06/30/25 | | Plum plaza becky | 06/30/25 | | Obsidian locus mexican | 06/30/25 | | elite tanning salon | 06/30/25 | | mind-boggling slippery puppy casino | 06/30/25 | | emerald indecent gaming laptop | 06/30/25 | | fantasy-prone masturbator dilemma | 06/30/25 | | gay vivacious brunch volcanic crater | 06/30/25 | | Cream toilet seat church building | 06/30/25 | | Mustard Orchestra Pit Corn Cake | 06/30/25 | | ruddy thriller public bath | 06/30/25 | | Concupiscible son of senegal feces | 06/30/25 | | Obsidian locus mexican | 06/30/25 | | Concupiscible son of senegal feces | 06/30/25 | | elite tanning salon | 06/30/25 | | Rose lascivious cuckold | 06/30/25 | | pontificating potus | 06/30/25 | | Dashing flickering center pocket flask | 06/30/25 | | Cream toilet seat church building | 06/30/25 | | bisexual medicated faggot firefighter | 06/30/25 | | Spruce Contagious Nowag | 06/30/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 30th, 2025 10:34 AM Author: Obsidian locus mexican
Sotomayor’s dissent is clearly the best of the three opinions. Majority’s opinion is disingenuous. Court’s of equity historically had broad powers to fashion equitable remedies. Judiciary act of 1789 grants equitable powers to fed courts without limitations. Courts of equity in those days did not have any geographical limitations as far as injunctive relief. There was no bar against injunctions that would benefit others who were not plaintiffs to the action. As noted in Soto’s dissent, fed courts hearing tax cases for individual plaintiffs did grant universal injunctions to prohibit enforcement of the tax.
Majority is merely trying to limit Trump cases coming before the court because they can’t defend the merits of shit like an EO limiting birthright citizenship. Barrett is truly a disgusting disgrace of a human being.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060137) |
 |
Date: June 30th, 2025 10:41 AM Author: Plum plaza becky
There are literally powers that are denied to the courts even in equity because of Article III, like standing.
The majority never disputes that injunctions can run beyond geography.
The majority repeatedly acknowledges some injunctions can benefit non-parties like pollution.
Can you read?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060155) |
Date: June 30th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: pontificating potus
Lmao at any lib criticizing 'faulty legal reasoning.'
No doubt you thought the penumbra nonsense in RvW was great fundamental law and that a fair reading of the 14th Am clearly protects gay marriage. But also the Constitution says absolutely nothing about gov infringing the right to bear arms.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060233) |
|
|