You guys have a lot to say about Jackson’s opinion but what about Soto’s dis
| mildly autistic station queen of the night | 06/30/25 | | curious area selfie | 06/30/25 | | insecure old irish cottage kitty cat | 06/30/25 | | balding massive state wrinkle | 06/30/25 | | cowardly point | 06/30/25 | | chest-beating rehab factory reset button | 06/30/25 | | curious area selfie | 06/30/25 | | chest-beating rehab factory reset button | 06/30/25 | | curious area selfie | 06/30/25 | | chest-beating rehab factory reset button | 06/30/25 | | curious area selfie | 06/30/25 | | at-the-ready histrionic pozpig associate | 06/30/25 | | cowardly point | 06/30/25 | | chest-beating rehab factory reset button | 06/30/25 | | Coral heady dingle berry | 06/30/25 | | mildly autistic station queen of the night | 06/30/25 | | curious area selfie | 06/30/25 | | balding massive state wrinkle | 06/30/25 | | stimulating gay wizard | 06/30/25 | | gay institution | 06/30/25 | | Irate trailer park | 06/30/25 | | bat shit crazy pea-brained parlour | 06/30/25 | | Unhinged Comical Pistol Bawdyhouse | 06/30/25 | | electric church building stock car | 06/30/25 | | Supple carmine plaza travel guidebook | 06/30/25 | | mildly autistic station queen of the night | 06/30/25 | | Supple carmine plaza travel guidebook | 06/30/25 | | curious area selfie | 06/30/25 | | topaz dragon | 06/30/25 | | Erotic home | 06/30/25 | | free-loading crystalline jew | 06/30/25 | | bat shit crazy pea-brained parlour | 06/30/25 | | chest-beating rehab factory reset button | 06/30/25 | | navy dilemma | 06/30/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 30th, 2025 10:34 AM Author: mildly autistic station queen of the night
Sotomayor’s dissent is clearly the best of the three opinions. Majority’s opinion is disingenuous. Court’s of equity historically had broad powers to fashion equitable remedies. Judiciary act of 1789 grants equitable powers to fed courts without limitations. Courts of equity in those days did not have any geographical limitations as far as injunctive relief. There was no bar against injunctions that would benefit others who were not plaintiffs to the action. As noted in Soto’s dissent, fed courts hearing tax cases for individual plaintiffs did grant universal injunctions to prohibit enforcement of the tax.
Majority is merely trying to limit Trump cases coming before the court because they can’t defend the merits of shit like an EO limiting birthright citizenship. Barrett is truly a disgusting disgrace of a human being.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060137) |
 |
Date: June 30th, 2025 10:41 AM Author: Coral heady dingle berry
There are literally powers that are denied to the courts even in equity because of Article III, like standing.
The majority never disputes that injunctions can run beyond geography.
The majority repeatedly acknowledges some injunctions can benefit non-parties like pollution.
Can you read?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060155) |
Date: June 30th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: Erotic home
Lmao at any lib criticizing 'faulty legal reasoning.'
No doubt you thought the penumbra nonsense in RvW was great fundamental law and that a fair reading of the 14th Am clearly protects gay marriage. But also the Constitution says absolutely nothing about gov infringing the right to bear arms.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060233) |
|
|