You guys have a lot to say about Jackson’s opinion but what about Soto’s dis
| Ruby arousing orchestra pit knife | 06/30/25 | | fuchsia tantric locus | 06/30/25 | | abusive crawly pervert | 06/30/25 | | charcoal range juggernaut | 06/30/25 | | french senate | 06/30/25 | | shivering shrine fortuitous meteor | 06/30/25 | | fuchsia tantric locus | 06/30/25 | | shivering shrine fortuitous meteor | 06/30/25 | | fuchsia tantric locus | 06/30/25 | | shivering shrine fortuitous meteor | 06/30/25 | | fuchsia tantric locus | 06/30/25 | | poppy business firm | 06/30/25 | | french senate | 06/30/25 | | shivering shrine fortuitous meteor | 06/30/25 | | talented preventive strike blood rage | 06/30/25 | | Ruby arousing orchestra pit knife | 06/30/25 | | fuchsia tantric locus | 06/30/25 | | charcoal range juggernaut | 06/30/25 | | boyish famous landscape painting station | 06/30/25 | | aromatic cyan step-uncle's house | 06/30/25 | | brindle institution philosopher-king | 06/30/25 | | cream halford | 06/30/25 | | yellow judgmental kitchen | 06/30/25 | | Primrose Alpha Theatre | 06/30/25 | | Chrome exciting site | 06/30/25 | | Ruby arousing orchestra pit knife | 06/30/25 | | Chrome exciting site | 06/30/25 | | fuchsia tantric locus | 06/30/25 | | Chocolate appetizing plaza codepig | 06/30/25 | | Domesticated resort corn cake | 06/30/25 | | marvelous stage generalized bond | 06/30/25 | | cream halford | 06/30/25 | | shivering shrine fortuitous meteor | 06/30/25 | | ultramarine mind-boggling corner mexican | 06/30/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 30th, 2025 10:34 AM Author: Ruby arousing orchestra pit knife
Sotomayor’s dissent is clearly the best of the three opinions. Majority’s opinion is disingenuous. Court’s of equity historically had broad powers to fashion equitable remedies. Judiciary act of 1789 grants equitable powers to fed courts without limitations. Courts of equity in those days did not have any geographical limitations as far as injunctive relief. There was no bar against injunctions that would benefit others who were not plaintiffs to the action. As noted in Soto’s dissent, fed courts hearing tax cases for individual plaintiffs did grant universal injunctions to prohibit enforcement of the tax.
Majority is merely trying to limit Trump cases coming before the court because they can’t defend the merits of shit like an EO limiting birthright citizenship. Barrett is truly a disgusting disgrace of a human being.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060137) |
 |
Date: June 30th, 2025 10:41 AM Author: talented preventive strike blood rage
There are literally powers that are denied to the courts even in equity because of Article III, like standing.
The majority never disputes that injunctions can run beyond geography.
The majority repeatedly acknowledges some injunctions can benefit non-parties like pollution.
Can you read?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060155) |
Date: June 30th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: Domesticated resort corn cake
Lmao at any lib criticizing 'faulty legal reasoning.'
No doubt you thought the penumbra nonsense in RvW was great fundamental law and that a fair reading of the 14th Am clearly protects gay marriage. But also the Constitution says absolutely nothing about gov infringing the right to bear arms.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744580&forum_id=2],#49060233) |
|
|