XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| turquoise principal's office | 07/04/25 | | Big school milk | 07/04/25 | | zombie-like native macaca | 07/04/25 | | Odious domesticated locale goyim | 07/04/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/04/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/04/25 | | Big school milk | 07/04/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/04/25 | | Big school milk | 07/04/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/04/25 | | Big school milk | 07/05/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/05/25 | | supple yarmulke | 07/05/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/06/25 | | supple yarmulke | 07/05/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/05/25 | | supple yarmulke | 07/06/25 | | Cowardly reading party orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | Carnelian school cafeteria | 07/05/25 | | Grizzly Talented Institution | 07/06/25 | | Carnelian school cafeteria | 07/06/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/06/25 | | Carnelian school cafeteria | 07/06/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/06/25 | | appetizing fanboi | 07/05/25 | | Curious laser beams | 07/06/25 | | exciting french theatre | 07/05/25 | | Irradiated disturbing public bath faggot firefighter | 07/06/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/06/25 | | nudist glittery point | 07/06/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/06/25 | | wine electric furnace | 07/06/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/06/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/06/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/06/25 | | Cowardly reading party orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/06/25 | | Grizzly Talented Institution | 07/06/25 | | turquoise principal's office | 07/06/25 | | nudist glittery point | 07/06/25 | | Curious laser beams | 07/06/25 | | outnumbered ladyboy office | 07/06/25 | | Boyish locus | 07/06/25 | | Bateful Sienna Scourge Upon The Earth Parlour | 07/06/25 | | Embarrassed to the bone sickened philosopher-king voyeur | 07/06/25 | | Bateful Sienna Scourge Upon The Earth Parlour | 07/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle stage personal credit line | 07/06/25 | | Carnelian school cafeteria | 07/06/25 | | Laughsome umber skinny woman | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: outnumbered ladyboy office
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: outnumbered ladyboy office
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: outnumbered ladyboy office
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: outnumbered ladyboy office
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Irradiated disturbing public bath faggot firefighter
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Cowardly reading party orchestra pit
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Curious laser beams
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076800) |
|
|