\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Musk saw Prighozin's bridge

Prighozin's mutiny required 1000x more guts than Musk's tant...
cracking burgundy sneaky criminal
  06/05/25
Explain this incident. I never got why Prigozhin challenged ...
Adventurous milk
  06/05/25
It was 95% suicidal, which means it makes no logical sense. ...
cracking burgundy sneaky criminal
  06/05/25
I doubt anyone refused orders. Or else they would be dealt w...
brilliant philosopher-king
  06/05/25
The mutineers took the city of Rostov - population 1.1 milli...
cracking burgundy sneaky criminal
  06/05/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 5th, 2025 11:26 PM
Author: cracking burgundy sneaky criminal

Prighozin's mutiny required 1000x more guts than Musk's tantrum, but even Prighozin backed down from his drive towards Moscow when he got word from his contacts in the military that a special forces battalion loyal to Putin was deploying on a crucial bridge over a large river south of Moscow. Reportedly, they had every intention of defending it or, in the worst case scenario, blowing it up. There's some video of them deploying, and they seemed to mean business.

I wonder what Prighozin's bridge was for Musk - maybe the poll showing only 6% of Republicans supported him over Trump.

In any event, it sucks for the viewing audience that there always seems to be a Prighozin's bridge in situations like this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734053&forum_id=2],#48991162)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 5th, 2025 11:31 PM
Author: Adventurous milk

Explain this incident. I never got why Prigozhin challenged the strongman of Russia in the first place. Was Prighozin really planning on overthrowing Putin. And then all of a sudden “backs down” with his fate sealed in stone. Makes no sense to me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734053&forum_id=2],#48991171)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 5th, 2025 11:34 PM
Author: cracking burgundy sneaky criminal

It was 95% suicidal, which means it makes no logical sense. But after seeing how the mutiny played out, there does seem to have been a 5% chance considering that, except for that last special forces unit, almost all of Russia's military had been unwilling to fight the Wagner mutineers. Pilots were refusing orders to bomb their convoy and shit. Prighozin must have had reason to believe that this would be the case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734053&forum_id=2],#48991181)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 5th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: brilliant philosopher-king

I doubt anyone refused orders. Or else they would be dealt with later, no?

Seems more likely Pytin let it play out for some reason we don't know.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734053&forum_id=2],#48991195)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 5th, 2025 11:41 PM
Author: cracking burgundy sneaky criminal

The mutineers took the city of Rostov - population 1.1 million - without a shot being fired. There was a large Russian army base there- pretty sure they had orders not to allow that to happen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734053&forum_id=2],#48991205)