XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/04/25 | | Heady Fiercely-loyal Antidepressant Drug | 07/04/25 | | Mind-boggling Cowardly Set Windowlicker | 07/04/25 | | boyish chocolate legal warrant spot | 07/04/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/04/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/04/25 | | Heady Fiercely-loyal Antidepressant Drug | 07/04/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/04/25 | | Heady Fiercely-loyal Antidepressant Drug | 07/04/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/04/25 | | Heady Fiercely-loyal Antidepressant Drug | 07/05/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/05/25 | | razzle milk | 07/05/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/06/25 | | razzle milk | 07/05/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/05/25 | | razzle milk | 07/06/25 | | Gaped khaki hairy legs round eye | 07/06/25 | | Dull Dilemma Gaming Laptop | 07/05/25 | | Adventurous Effete Ape | 07/06/25 | | Dull Dilemma Gaming Laptop | 07/06/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/06/25 | | Dull Dilemma Gaming Laptop | 07/06/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/06/25 | | drunken theatre famous landscape painting | 07/05/25 | | Sapphire Racy Cuck | 07/06/25 | | Odious violent wagecucks macaca | 07/05/25 | | Spectacular Party Of The First Part Menage | 07/06/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/06/25 | | up-to-no-good soul-stirring fortuitous meteor | 07/06/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/06/25 | | arousing therapy | 07/06/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/06/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/06/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/06/25 | | Gaped khaki hairy legs round eye | 07/06/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/06/25 | | Adventurous Effete Ape | 07/06/25 | | Avocado yarmulke background story | 07/06/25 | | up-to-no-good soul-stirring fortuitous meteor | 07/06/25 | | Sapphire Racy Cuck | 07/06/25 | | at-the-ready sepia area | 07/06/25 | | Comical stage | 07/06/25 | | poppy shrine lettuce | 07/06/25 | | lascivious institution | 07/06/25 | | poppy shrine lettuce | 07/06/25 | | crimson kink-friendly digit ratio space | 07/06/25 | | Dull Dilemma Gaming Laptop | 07/06/25 | | Appetizing insanely creepy garrison community account | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: at-the-ready sepia area
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: at-the-ready sepia area
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: at-the-ready sepia area
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: at-the-ready sepia area
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Spectacular Party Of The First Part Menage
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Gaped khaki hairy legs round eye
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Sapphire Racy Cuck
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2],#49076800) |
|
|