http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2013/04/how-i-am-partly-to-blame-for-mass-immigration.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2219985&forum_id=2],#22928949)

When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible.

It wasn't because we liked immigrants, but because we didn't like Britain. We saw immigrants - from anywhere - as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties.

Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people - usually in the poorest parts of Britain - who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly 'vibrant communities'.

If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots.

Revolutionary students didn't come from such 'vibrant' areas (we came, as far as I could tell, mostly from Surrey and the nicer parts of London).

We might live in 'vibrant' places for a few (usually squalid) years, amid unmown lawns and overflowing dustbins.

But we did so as irresponsible, childless transients - not as homeowners, or as parents of school-age children, or as old people hoping for a bit of serenity at the ends of their lives.

When we graduated and began to earn serious money, we generally headed for expensive London enclaves and became extremely choosy about where our children went to school, a choice we happily denied the urban poor, the ones we sneered at as 'racists'.

What did we know, or care, of the great silent revolution which even then was beginning to transform the lives of the British poor?

To us, it meant patriotism and tradition could always be derided as 'racist'.

And it also meant cheap servants for the rich new middle-class, for the first time since 1939, as well as cheap restaurants and - later on - cheap builders and plumbers working off the books.

It wasn't our wages that were depressed, or our work that was priced out of the market. Immigrants didn't do the sort of jobs we did.

They were no threat to us.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2219985&forum_id=2],#22928984)

immigration has flooded the country with cheap workers and broken the back of labor. it has destabilized the culture, dehumanized the people, led to an erosion of civil rights and a semi-police state, in which the population can be exploited as cheap-labor or fobbed off w/ food stamps, allowing corporations to pursue their internationalist-capitalist agenda.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2219985&forum_id=2],#22934260)

as someone who grew up around immigrants and later studied with shitlibs, this is so fucking spot on

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2219985&forum_id=2],#23381212)

Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people - usually in the poorest parts of Britain - who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly 'vibrant communities'.

If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2219985&forum_id=2],#22929028)

Multiculturalism is bloodless genocide no matter how you spin it.

If defending your identity, homeland, culture, traditions and ethnicity is racism, then I am a racist. I am a Han Chinese man who has lived in a multiculturalism society for 21 years, and I can see absolutely no benefits to it. White Britons, like people anywhere, have the right to maintain their own distinctiveness without being made to feel guilty for being "intolerant."

Solidarity with nationalists worldwide.

Posted by: xiaofang

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2219985&forum_id=2],#48926650)