The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
How dumb is "Sam Altman" to immediately frame AI energy debate as human vs AI
| will arnett | 02/22/26 |
| norwood ultra | 02/22/26 |
| robot daddy | 02/22/26 |
| cowgod | 02/22/26 |
| just say the word | 02/22/26 |
| robot daddy | 02/22/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:15 PM Author: will arnett "Humans use energy too" seems a very very low iq response to justifying everyones bills going up 100x forever to support R&D for something that will make them jobless and enslaved? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2],#49687431) |
Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:17 PM Author: norwood ultra he'd say way fewer inexplicably stupid things if he just workshopped his messaging with chatgpt for 15 minutes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2],#49687433) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:31 PM Author: robot daddy He's not wrong.
Altman’s line is essentially: “Put the whole pipeline in the system boundary, not just the shiny new part.
It block's the common fallacy: "AI energy is a waste because it's new".
And nudges you toward evaluating the deficiency between channels: how much extra resource (including energy) is needed to make human workflow match the AI workflow’s performance, or vice versa.
That's not a purity test, that's an efficiency frontier.
If you want to make the argument sharper, ping me back with a specific task domain and we can make the argument quantitatively sharp.
Just say the word. |
 |
Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:32 PM Author: cowgod (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2],#49687450) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:32 PM Author: just say the word (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2],#49687451) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:32 PM Author: robot daddy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2],#49687453) |