The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
New Study shows Immigration cost US $14.5 TRILLON last 3 Decades
| AZNgirl talking Selfie with Snow Leopard Handsome | 02/03/26 |
| AZNgirl talking Selfie with Snow Leopard Handsome | 02/03/26 |
| brother andrews | 02/03/26 |
| Angry Man Dinner | 02/03/26 |
| N904PD | 02/03/26 |
| Nippon Professional Baseball | 02/03/26 |
| some on social media | 02/03/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 3rd, 2026 4:19 PM Author: AZNgirl talking Selfie with Snow Leopard Handsome WOW
David J. Bier @David_J_Bier Today @CatoInstitute published our report providing the first look at the fiscal effects of the wave of legal & illegal immigration over the last 3 decades. It shows immigrants created surpluses every year, by a combined $14.5 trillion, even as deficits grew
https://x.com/David_J_Bier/status/2018720870466756922 |
Date: February 3rd, 2026 4:21 PM Author: AZNgirl talking Selfie with Snow Leopard Handsome opps!
Cato Institute @CatoInstitute · 3h The US immigrant population generated more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government every year from 1994 to 2023.
The Cato study provides the first-ever 30-year analysis of the fiscal effects of immigration on government budgets. Learn more from @David_J_Bier .
https://x.com/CatoInstitute/status/2018738115821625548 |
 |
Date: February 3rd, 2026 4:33 PM Author: brother andrews THEYRE NOT OLD YET
Fucking retard |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2026 4:24 PM Author: Angry Man Dinner Lol @ this shit you haven't lived in the US for years loser you just want it to be as shitty as India (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830613&forum_id=2],#49644460) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2026 4:28 PM Author: N904PD Yes it’s true we massaged the data to make our point but even if we didn’t the result would still be the same (SOURCE: trust me bro)
Throughout this paper, we use “immigrants” to refer only to people who were noncitizens at birth. Of course, immigrants have US-born children who attend schools, but those children are natural-born Americans, not immigrants; attributing their costs to the “immigrant” category would be inaccurate and would incorrectly lower the cost of the US-born population. It would also obscure the comparison with the US-born population. Finally, treating the second generation as immigrants would lead to an inaccurate perception regarding the ability of Congress to restrict benefits to immigrants specifically. Regardless, as we show in a later section, the second generation is America’s most fiscally positive generation at any given age, meaning that children of immigrants will pay for their costs in the future once they graduate. |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2026 4:30 PM Author: Nippon Professional Baseball SOURCE: trust me bro tp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830613&forum_id=2],#49644472) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2026 4:40 PM Author: some on social media Imagine how prosperous Somalia would be if they brought back so of their amazing entrepreneurs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830613&forum_id=2],#49644496) |