Isn't the solution to AI in college (cheating) obvious?
| Jet Frozen Sex Offender Office | 05/15/25 | | Self-centered Bateful Gas Station | 05/15/25 | | Jet Frozen Sex Offender Office | 05/15/25 | | Cerise magical brunch sneaky criminal | 05/15/25 | | appetizing dog poop public bath | 05/15/25 | | salmon fear-inspiring gunner base | 05/16/25 | | clear alcoholic background story | 05/16/25 | | Opaque faggot firefighter locale | 05/15/25 | | Jet Frozen Sex Offender Office | 05/15/25 | | Self-centered Bateful Gas Station | 05/15/25 | | Jet Frozen Sex Offender Office | 05/15/25 | | red sticky corn cake | 05/15/25 | | dashing at-the-ready halford immigrant | 05/15/25 | | Pearl 180 goyim | 05/15/25 | | Passionate dysfunction institution | 05/15/25 | | Pearl 180 goyim | 05/15/25 | | Jet Frozen Sex Offender Office | 05/15/25 | | Cerise magical brunch sneaky criminal | 05/15/25 | | Passionate dysfunction institution | 05/15/25 | | Flesh Legend Parlor | 05/15/25 | | vigorous shimmering nibblets | 05/15/25 | | Purple Mood Market | 05/17/25 | | Chrome stirring codepig volcanic crater | 05/15/25 | | Opaque faggot firefighter locale | 05/15/25 | | chest-beating dopamine | 05/15/25 | | vigorous shimmering nibblets | 05/16/25 | | aqua pocket flask | 05/15/25 | | azure personal credit line faggotry | 05/15/25 | | vigorous shimmering nibblets | 05/15/25 | | Pearl 180 goyim | 05/15/25 | | swashbuckling geriatric hell | 05/15/25 | | vigorous shimmering nibblets | 05/16/25 | | Slap-happy Hissy Fit Partner | 05/16/25 | | Jet Frozen Sex Offender Office | 05/17/25 | | Opaque faggot firefighter locale | 05/21/25 | | yapping stag film | 05/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 15th, 2025 6:04 PM Author: Jet Frozen Sex Offender Office
I browsed r/professors after seeing it in another thread here and it's all about how students use AI all day long on their written assignments and lie about it, the ways that profs have of trying to catch them, and how there are no consequences due to the college admins.
Just use in-class written exams. The profs could even still coddle students with this method by offering 3 or 4 throughout the semester and dropping the worst one from an average.
This may not work for English lit where you traditionally had to write longer research papers but it could be used for almost every other major.
Thoughts?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2],#48934725) |
Date: May 15th, 2025 10:27 PM Author: swashbuckling geriatric hell
It's incredibly obvious that the solution needs to be:
1. In person testing
2. An understanding that it is acceptable to use AI on any take home assignments
And this obviously isn't new. People have been cheating on take home assignments for 100 years. At least with AI the people are doig the work themselves with tools that are availale to them instead of paying some freshman to do it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2],#48935498) |
 |
Date: May 16th, 2025 6:31 AM Author: vigorous shimmering nibblets
“BUT DO we really want to repeat the mistakes of the past??? Timed tests are problematic and exclusionary!!!!”
They want to let the whole class write a take home vibes based opinion piece about how their truth is valid because they felt something once in March, but they also need to ensure no “AI” or “bad takes” are involved. Very concerning bind they are in right now. Very concerning indeed!
So now they’re sitting there in committee meetings clutching their syllabi like rosary beads, whispering about “pedagogical integrity” while quietly running GPT-4 through Grammarly in a second tab.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2],#48936038) |
Date: May 16th, 2025 3:53 PM Author: Slap-happy Hissy Fit Partner
It's the obvious solution, but here are the issues (and why it has not been implemented, yet):
(1) Unis/Colleges are highly beurocratic organizations akin to government agencies and act comparably slow / retarded.
(2) Faculty, especially tenured professors, are EXTREMLY resistant to any change. This kind of thing would need to be voted on by the faculty of the individual colleges / schools in most universities. Impossible to get the buy in.
(3) UGs don't yet have the laptop requirements for students that LSs have. Schools would be scared of shitlib blowback REQUIRING students to buy a laptop.
(4) That exam software is somewhat pricey and and school would have to pay for it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725569&forum_id=2],#48937466) |
|
|