Strange little attribute of the Court of International Trade
| pearl house | 05/27/25 | | vigorous poppy idiot principal's office | 05/27/25 | | tan concupiscible wagecucks set | 05/28/25 | | soul-stirring purple toaster parlour | 05/29/25 | | tan concupiscible wagecucks set | 05/29/25 | | rebellious spot | 05/29/25 | | Passionate Bisexual Old Irish Cottage Trust Fund | 05/29/25 | | Razzmatazz Bull Headed Property | 05/28/25 | | tan concupiscible wagecucks set | 05/28/25 | | pearl house | 05/28/25 | | tan concupiscible wagecucks set | 05/28/25 | | pearl house | 05/28/25 | | tan concupiscible wagecucks set | 05/28/25 | | drunken garrison | 05/28/25 | | amethyst lettuce | 05/28/25 | | adventurous haunted graveyard kitty cat | 05/28/25 | | pearl house | 05/28/25 | | tan concupiscible wagecucks set | 05/28/25 | | Black elite nursing home | 05/28/25 | | pearl house | 05/28/25 | | Curious meetinghouse | 05/28/25 | | pearl house | 05/29/25 | | Razzmatazz Bull Headed Property | 05/29/25 | | soul-stirring purple toaster parlour | 05/29/25 | | Razzmatazz Bull Headed Property | 05/29/25 | | soul-stirring purple toaster parlour | 05/29/25 | | pearl house | 05/29/25 | | soul-stirring purple toaster parlour | 05/29/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 27th, 2025 7:58 PM Author: pearl house
This is the federal court that’s ruling this week or next on whether to issue a preliminary injunction blocking Trump’s tariffs
It’s an Article III Court comprised of nine judges. However, by statute, no more than five of the nine members can be from the same political party:
“The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, nine judges who shall constitute a court of record to be known as the United States Court of International Trade. Not more than five of such judges shall be from the same political party. The court is a court established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/251?
So that’s pretty weird, and possibly unconstitutional.
But that aside, how exactly does an Article III Judge declare their membership in a political party? And what prevents one from pretending to be from a smaller third party while having allegiances to one of the two main parties so as to in effect give that main party more than five judges on the court?
Btw this is the only Article III Court in the entire country that has a statutory limit on the number of judges from the same political party.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5730486&forum_id=2],#48966178) |
Date: May 27th, 2025 8:10 PM Author: vigorous poppy idiot principal's office
wtf that does seem unconstitutional
Incredible that china Joe nominated a Beijing born Chinese lady to represent the us on the court of *international* trade. Does CCP membership count as dem or repub?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Wang_(judge)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5730486&forum_id=2],#48966211) |
Date: May 28th, 2025 10:35 AM Author: adventurous haunted graveyard kitty cat
wow robert katzmann (rip) twin brother is on the court
wonder if they ever benched swapped
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5730486&forum_id=2],#48967281) |
Date: May 29th, 2025 12:32 PM Author: soul-stirring purple toaster parlour
(((Stephen Miller))) posted the three judges pics and said there's "judicial tyranny" someone asked Grok who appointed the Judges and one was appointed by TRUMP in 2019 ljl and another by Reagan
So apparently this judicial tyranny is by TRUMP JUDGES against TRUMP.Veddy concerning! Someone shld look into this
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5730486&forum_id=2],#48970863) |
|
|