\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Founding Fathers didn't draft the 2nd Amendment with guntoting niggers in mind

They clearly did not mean for niggers to carry firearms. Wh...
vermilion swollen old irish cottage private investor
  07/08/25
there was that UF or something law student posted about here...
galvanic sickened factory reset button
  07/08/25
...
filthy motley keepsake machete philosopher-king
  07/08/25
the founding fathers' cost-benefit analysis for allowing a r...
vermilion swollen old irish cottage private investor
  07/08/25
100% interestingly, Switzerland also has a constitutional r...
galvanic sickened factory reset button
  07/08/25
Correct. Most early “gun control” laws were spec...
Bronze confused forum
  07/08/25
...
filthy motley keepsake machete philosopher-king
  07/08/25
...
Bronze confused forum
  07/09/25
Or individuals of any race. They just didn't want to threate...
Marvelous ratface
  07/09/25
No, even the militia-minded view was an individual right to ...
impertinent mind-boggling boistinker point
  07/09/25
...
cream exhilarant theatre pozpig
  07/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:41 AM
Author: vermilion swollen old irish cottage private investor

They clearly did not mean for niggers to carry firearms. Why is this never mentioned by originalists?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49082201)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: galvanic sickened factory reset button

there was that UF or something law student posted about here a few weeks ago who wrote an article saying exactly this, that the originalist interpretation clearly means the freedom only applies to White people and was never intended for negros

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49082215)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:45 AM
Author: filthy motley keepsake machete philosopher-king



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49082217)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:53 AM
Author: vermilion swollen old irish cottage private investor

the founding fathers' cost-benefit analysis for allowing a right to bear arms clearly assumed niggers would be in cages and not allowed to get anywhere near guns, ever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49082242)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:01 AM
Author: galvanic sickened factory reset button

100%

interestingly, Switzerland also has a constitutional right to bear arms *FOR CITIZENS* (it's a very heavily armed country), but the law also specifically *bans* foreigners of certain enumerated nationalities (a bunch of muslim and black african countries) resident in the country from owning arms

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49082265)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:37 AM
Author: Bronze confused forum

Correct. Most early “gun control” laws were specifically created with that purpose.

Hilariously, California had to cite some of these laws to defend its own shitlib gun control laws due to Thomas’ “history and tradition” test created in Bruen: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-02-07/if-we-must-rely-on-history-and-tradition-to-assess-gun-laws-does-racist-history-count . Of course they added an “ith tho rathist” disclaimer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49082362)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:39 AM
Author: filthy motley keepsake machete philosopher-king



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49082369)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 1:40 AM
Author: Bronze confused forum



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49085166)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 1:42 AM
Author: Marvelous ratface

Or individuals of any race. They just didn't want to threaten state militia since there was no national army yet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49085168)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 2:22 AM
Author: impertinent mind-boggling boistinker point

No, even the militia-minded view was an individual right to own weapons suitable for militia use, because they also viewed the militia as checking state authority.

Here's an 1840 case taking this view https://guncite.com/court/state/21tn154.html ("If the citizens have these arms in their hands, they are prepared in the best possible manner to repel any encroachments upon their rights by those in authority.")

BTW, what army did George Washington command?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49085182)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 6:40 AM
Author: cream exhilarant theatre pozpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2],#49085300)