The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
It's crazy how much libs hate Texas
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:26 AM Author: r'ape-ist They can't stand that this place exists and that it's not falling apart. They want it to suck so bad. They'll tell you that it's a failed state and nothing works. Meanwhile more third worlders move to Texas than any lib state. Odd case for this otherwise failed state! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979739) |
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:29 AM Author: that buzz, that bling, that smile There are more libs in Texas than all other states besides California and New York. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979746) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:44 AM Author: r'ape-ist Right and there are more Trumpmos in California than any state. What's your point? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979769) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:45 AM Author: that buzz, that bling, that smile Libs love Texas (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979772) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:48 AM Author: r'ape-ist If this were true then a lot more libs would move there. There are enough libs to turn Texas blue but they literally cannot stomach the place. They realistically trail statewide offices by north of 10 points. If Texas was so great for libs they would be chipping away at that deficit. By contrast it appears to be growing. You think given the stakes it is basically a one shot kill that would ruin the GOP's chances forever if libs conquered it. But they can't. The vast majority of libs would absolutely hate living in Texas. They don't move there in large numbers ever. So you're just wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979775) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:50 AM Author: that buzz, that bling, that smile What year are you posting from? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979780) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:54 AM Author: r'ape-ist The one where Paxton wins by double digits, friend. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979787) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:49 AM Author: Debunked antisemitic trope texas is a fucking paper tiger and normal people including libs hate it for obvious clear reasons. just a blowhard piece of shit filled with people like sealclubber (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979777) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 11:54 AM Author: r'ape-ist What the fuck? You seem unhinged. Why would anyone hate Texas? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979786) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:09 PM Author: Debunked antisemitic trope Because of what I just wrote? How is this in any way a response. Texans are blowhard fags and have been since they begged the union to admit them and protect them from the Mexicans |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 2:00 PM Author: r'ape-ist How is San Francisco treating you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979963) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:27 PM Author: the ghost of the dead friend Texas's history is very leftist so if OP is true, that's retarded (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979904) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:56 PM Author: r'ape-ist It's practically a Socialist nightmare if you really think about it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979952) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:34 PM Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; Leftists looooove Austin but can do without the rest of Texas, and most would be surprised to discover eg what Houston and San Antonio are actually like. But it’s also like a super rat faced pube headed guy lying that he’s not attracted to busty blondes who stay in shape and wear a lot of make up. You know, the type that poasts endless threads about Sydney Sweeney’s prole face. The second Texas gives libs the time of day they will be spread eagle on the floor begging Texas to make its dick pound libs’ tonsils raw. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979920) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:37 PM Author: the ghost of the dead friend lmao you know the diff between libs and leftists, right? lol @ someone conflating the two and thinking their political opinions are worth more than shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979926) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:59 PM Author: r'ape-ist As a pubehead who likes Sydney Sweeney, this is very triggering (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979961) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:42 PM Author: the ghost of the dead friend one thing I don't understand about shitlibs or shitcons is them rooting for failure of the other "team." this includes OP, from what I've seen before (and he's probably projecting here tbh).
anyone who is too obsessed with partisanship to want the best for all their fellow citizens is a BAD PERSON. this goes for 100% of politicians - they'll openly admit this - and way too many non-politicians. you people need to WAKE UP. |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:49 PM Author: that buzz, that bling, that smile A team of Harvard social psychologists (Lehr, Ferreira, and Banaji, 2017) selected Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees fans (rivals comparable to fans of Ohio State and Michigan football) as participants. In several surveys, they asked the fans how much they would pay to produce either their own team's win versus the rival team's loss. Overall, fans were willing to pay more for the rival’s loss than their own team’s win. The surveys were completed over a period of a few years; in this time, the relative fortunes of the Red Sox and the Yankees reversed. The willingness to pay was stronger when the participants' own team was behind in the rivalry; that is, when fans had more to gain (in relative status) by seeing the rival falter. |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 1:51 PM Author: the ghost of the dead friend people are SPS. I was actually thinking yesterday, I bet there's a correlation between people who are into partisan politics and people who are heavy into sports and sports teams. it seems pretty likely that people who identify as independents would be less into sports in general because we're so much more Free Thinking than people brainwashed enough to identify with a "political party" in 2026.
but that study doesn't really say much about how people are when the stakes are life and death instead of a silly game |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 2:01 PM Author: r'ape-ist Yeah it must have so crazy and toxic to "root for a sports team." Yeah that's the problem... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979965) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 2:10 PM Author: the ghost of the dead friend no, there's a difference between: 1) enjoying watching sports; 2) having favorite teams; and 3) being HEAVY into teams and rivalries and stuff
my parents are into hockey and go to games a lot and are long-time Caps fans but they don't get UPSET when they lose, nor would they be the people in that study who would rather see rivals lose. |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 2:44 PM Author: r'ape-ist Yeah I don't know too many people that care about the other team losing more than their teams winning. Seems pretty rare. Most people root for their team until they get knocked out. After that they may root against a rival. But it's not that serious. Doubt there's any connection to politics. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49980005) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 2:46 PM Author: the ghost of the dead friend maybe it's specific to psychotic New Englanders (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49980009) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 2:11 PM Author: gaetan dugas its essentially india now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979976) |
|
Date: July 5th, 2026 2:29 PM Author: total lawyer genocide (🧐) Cr Dallas and Houston are steaming shitholes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879799&forum_id=2]#49979992) |