The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Lascivious territorial senate | 01/06/26 | | maize boyish hell | 01/06/26 | | Jet-lagged Native | 01/06/26 | | maize boyish hell | 01/06/26 | | Jet-lagged Native | 01/06/26 | | maize boyish hell | 01/06/26 | | Lascivious territorial senate | 01/06/26 | | maize boyish hell | 01/06/26 | | Lascivious territorial senate | 01/06/26 | | Charismatic scarlet deer antler | 01/07/26 | | metal site therapy | 01/06/26 | | odious light selfie trust fund | 01/06/26 | | Jet-lagged Native | 01/06/26 | | chocolate pozpig | 01/06/26 | | Jet-lagged Native | 01/06/26 | | Comical fighting macaca kitchen | 01/06/26 | | orchid very tactful casino coldplay fan | 01/06/26 | | idiotic stage shitlib | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: maize boyish hell
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2Ã#49568134) |
|
|