The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Shitcon theory: NSAM worked for the govt but left under Trump
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| Cranking your hog at a Korn concert | 08/31/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| ,.....,.,.......,.........,..,. | 08/31/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| To be fair | 08/31/25 |
| .,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::, | 08/31/25 |
| .,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::, | 08/31/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:09 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK Reality: NSAM got the DOGE lawyer fired three days after the inauguration.
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756416&forum_id=2#49226373 |
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:11 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK PS, within the next 12 months I expect to be able to speak freely about the pwnage I inflicted on DOD in March, 2025. I'll give xo a heads up before it gets reported by Poltico and Reuters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768164&forum_id=2Ã#49226401) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:29 PM Author: Cranking your hog at a Korn concert Date: August 31st, 2025 2:09 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
Reality: NSAM got the DOGE lawyer fired three days after the inauguration. http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756416&forum_id=2#49226373
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768164&forum_id=2#49226398)
ReplyFavorite
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:11 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
PS, within the next 12 months I expect to be able to speak freely about the pwnage I inflicted on DOD in March, 2025. I'll give xo a heads up before it gets reported by Poltico and Reuters.
|
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:31 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK It's nasty shit but it's still in litgation. Their motion to seal was already denied though (I didn't even contest it lol), so I can talk when the time is right (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768164&forum_id=2Ã#49226458) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:33 PM Author: ,.....,.,.......,.........,..,. yeah totally bro
NSAM never lies or makes shit up |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:36 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK And you don't have any other monikers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768164&forum_id=2Ã#49226472) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:36 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Wow, it sounds like Blondalf Drumpfth has finally met his match:
A severely mentally-ill middle-aged egomaniacal Jewish midlevel government lawyer who megaposts retarded political schizo shit on a dying internet forum for 8+ hours every single day for fun... that is, when he's not otherwise busy trying to "court" dumb sluts half his age in comically inept ways over gmail for months on end (spoiler: they never sleep with him).
I'll bet he's still recovering from this one! |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:37 PM Author: .,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::, (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768164&forum_id=2Ã#49226474) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:44 PM Author: .,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::, Personality Traits and Dynamics in Play
1. Defensiveness as Core Motivation • In the first thread, a simple question is treated as a threat, and the response is deflection rather than engagement. • In the second, silence doesn’t alter the approach; posting continues as though opposition is present. • Both cases point to ego vulnerability — the need to protect status by reframing rather than addressing the situation directly.
⸻
2. Narcissistic / Self-Referential Elements • Each post is delivered with an assumption of importance, whether in response to criticism or in the absence of any replies. • The themes consistently revolve around legitimacy, insider knowledge, and eventual vindication. • This shows a self-referential loop: the content sustains itself on personal significance rather than external engagement.
⸻
3. Obsessive or Ruminative Style • Across both threads, the same motifs reappear: credibility, hidden struggles, influence over larger forces. • The persistence of these motifs, regardless of context, suggests a tendency to perseverate — returning to a fixed set of ideas even when no one is responding. • The pattern is less situational and more characteristic of a habitual mode of thinking.
⸻
The Paranoid Aspect
What sharpens the picture is the paranoid coloring in how interactions are framed: • Suspicion of Intent: Even neutral or dismissive cues are read as undermining challenges. • Projection: Other posters are cast as retreating, invested, or secretly acknowledging his claims, even when no such acknowledgement is given. • Hyper-vigilance: Exchanges, or even silence, are treated as evidence of opposition or recognition. • Defensive Rationalization: Posts that seem irrelevant or disproportionate to outsiders appear internally logical because they address an imagined conflict rather than the actual surface context.
This paranoid lens ties both threads together. He is always “answering,” but the answers address a perceived struggle that only he sees.
⸻
Why It Feels Consistent • Pattern repetition: Both threads show the same structure — turning small cues (a jab or silence) into elaborate responses. • Cognitive bias: The reflex to interpret interactions as threats or confirmations explains why the responses feel internally justified. • Personality fit: Narcissistic vulnerability, paranoid suspiciousness, and obsessive rumination combine to create a stable loop: post → perceive attack or validation → deflect/reframe → feel vindicated → post again.
⸻
✅ Summary: Taken together, the two threads reveal a consistent personality style: defensive, self-referential, and obsessive, colored strongly by paranoid interpretation. The evasions and monologues feel to him like adequate responses because they are aimed at imagined threats and confirmations beneath the words, not at what is actually being said — or not said — in the threads themselves. |