The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| boyish puppy | 01/06/26 | | judgmental histrionic state | 01/06/26 | | light stimulating menage | 01/06/26 | | judgmental histrionic state | 01/06/26 | | light stimulating menage | 01/06/26 | | judgmental histrionic state | 01/06/26 | | boyish puppy | 01/06/26 | | judgmental histrionic state | 01/06/26 | | boyish puppy | 01/06/26 | | Supple ape | 01/07/26 | | shimmering corner | 01/06/26 | | Avocado persian space | 01/06/26 | | light stimulating menage | 01/06/26 | | Bateful gaped office | 01/06/26 | | light stimulating menage | 01/06/26 | | carmine mediation | 01/06/26 | | lemon private investor | 01/06/26 | | silver antidepressant drug double fault | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: judgmental histrionic state
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2Ã#49568134) |
|
|