\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

why is Scholasticism the boogeyman of Philosophy

is it because it's true
laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison
  07/13/26
The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many differe...
brass internet-worthy clown
  07/13/26
Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors
laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison
  07/13/26
Bet
brass internet-worthy clown
  07/13/26
Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "auth...
vivacious hall
  07/13/26
The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible f...
brass internet-worthy clown
  07/13/26
Rupert Sheldrake discussed this
laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison
  07/13/26
The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuf...
brass internet-worthy clown
  07/13/26
...
laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison
  07/13/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:17 PM
Author: laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison

is it because it's true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49997960)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:27 PM
Author: brass internet-worthy clown

The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many different groups benefitted from portraying their predecessors as sterile schoolmen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49997987)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:28 PM
Author: laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison

Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49997989)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:33 PM
Author: brass internet-worthy clown

Bet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49997997)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:34 PM
Author: vivacious hall

Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "authorities" based on incomplete or corrupt corpora, and then materialism in the natural sciences proved so powerful that the idea that substantial forms have any causal power was almost entirely abandoned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49998000)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:52 PM
Author: brass internet-worthy clown

The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible forms that ground their identity, unity and directed activities still has not been decisively refuted by science. I think at the very least a naturalized account of form as causally efficacious organization is highly plausible, while the stronger scholastic ontology remains a live but unverified interpretation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49998043)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM
Author: laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison

Rupert Sheldrake discussed this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49998046)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:59 PM
Author: brass internet-worthy clown

The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuff he says regarding biology is obviously crankery, but actually not bad if taken as metaphor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49998061)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM
Author: laughsome disgusting doctorate garrison



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2テ「竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#49998047)