https://livingopposites.substack.com/p/the-observable-structure-of-reality

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882773&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50000427)

This is pretty standard jungian btw

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882773&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50000885)

4 Jung in Liber Novus: “You have in you the one God, the wonderfully beautiful and kind, the solitary, starlike, unmoving, he who is older and wiser than the father, he who has a safe hand, who leads you among all the darknesses and death scares of dreadful Abraxas. He gives joy and peace, since he is beyond death and beyond what is subject to change. He is no servant and no friend of Abraxas.” But this passage reintroduces a softened, internalized form of privatio boni - Jung is attempting to re-stabilize the psyche after Abraxas without collapsing back into moral dualism. He installs a counterweight as a psychologist because Abraxas alone is metabolically unbearable for most psyches. But this is weak; instead, my conception of the Self is as an integrator toward deeper self-understanding and interiority, connection to deeper aspects of oneself via intuition outside of one’s ego choice, and which is often surprising. One may choose to trust the Self, within reason, because the alternative is ego identification/ego inflation and an inability to choose between infinitely contradictory opposites. It is possible that the Self lies beyond the infinite contradictions as a result, but it is not clear, nor do I want this ambiguity resolved - it is better as an indeterminate guiding star, because labeling and classifying it would lead to dogma and ideology."

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-collapse-of-the-all-good-god

"The “beyond Abraxas” move is underdeveloped, but necessary. I introduced “hinting at a figure even beyond Abraxas” from Jung, which is also its softest point.8 Because if Abraxas is totality, what does “beyond” mean without contradiction? Either: (1) the Self emerges from Abraxas or (2) the Self participates in something beyond Abraxas. Option (2) risks smuggling back in the privatio boni, while option (1) risks total closure. Jung never resolved this, oscillating deliberately. That oscillation is a protective ambiguity, not a flaw, with reliance on apophatic escape, the unknowability of the Self, grace as non-derivable. Critics may say: “You reintroduced transcendence without grounding it.” I would answer that transcendence cannot be grounded without ceasing to be transcendence and any system that pretends otherwise becomes ideology.

Furthermore, Abraxas corrects the deficiencies of the all-good God, but Abraxas is not stable either. Its weaknesses include encouraging indifference, moral silence, psychic coldness - and these almost demand a further correction. This means Abraxas may not be the final god-image but acts as a necessary passage through horror and clarity, a stripping stage. In alchemical terms Abraxas may be nigredo clarified, not redeemed. The system still awaits a coniunctio that does not erase suffering but does not glorify it either. I gesture toward this possibility with the Self beyond Abraxas, grace as received, not earned, and individuation as orientation, not salvation. This ambiguity is not a weakness - it is a sign that the system is alive rather than closed."

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-collapse-of-the-all-good-god-b3a

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882773&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50000893)

But really, do you have even a moment of doubt after all your intense Jungian introspection training going from not knowing who Mig is last night to being kneejerk dismissive of him tonight? He actually knows what he's talking about here and is autistic enough to meaningfully engage with you on topics you proport to be studying. Even if you ultimately disagree, if you could put your ego aside and consider the possibility someone might know more than you about something you might actually learn something.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882773&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50000926)

this potential subthread wasteland is ending here fyi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882773&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50000935)