https://ciris.mt.cdcr.ca.gov/details?cdcrNumber=BW7253

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100192)

He's also filed a habeas petition alleging IAC, which I'm sure will also be dead on arrival.

The Church of Scientology filed an amicus brief and a bunch of other shitpaper in his appeal, which is funny. As if the Court of Appeal cares what they have to say.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100176)

just keep trying people repeatedly on 25-year-old rape allegations based on nothing until you get a jury full of angry, retarded women to convict, bro.

#BelieveAllWomyn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100225)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50106106)

The proof beyond a reasonable doubt meter here only goes up to 'he may have done this' and falls short of 'he probably did this.' Proof beyond a reasonable doubt LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50106138)

The major pieces of evidence and testimony that were newly allowed were:

The prosecution was allowed to explicitly argue that Masterson drugged the women. This was probably the single biggest change.

First trial (2022): The women could testify that they suddenly became dizzy, disoriented, blacked out, or lost memory, but prosecutors could not directly argue that Masterson had drugged them.

Retrial (2023): Judge Olmedo allowed prosecutors to state outright that the evidence showed Masterson had drugged the victims before assaulting them, despite there being no toxicology evidence because the allegations dated back roughly twenty years. The prosecution argued that the women's symptoms were consistent with incapacitating drugs such as GHB.

Expert testimony on Scientology was admitted.

First trial: The judge excluded expert testimony explaining Scientology's internal disciplinary system and why members might delay reporting crimes.

Retrial: Former Scientology executive Claire Headley was permitted to testify as an expert about Scientology policies, including testimony that members were discouraged from reporting fellow Scientologists to law enforcement and that internal church procedures could influence victims' behavior after an alleged assault. This was intended to explain why the accusers waited years before contacting police.

A different prior-acts witness testified.

California Evidence Code §1108 permits testimony from other alleged sexual assault victims to show a propensity for sexual offenses.

First trial: The prosecution called Tricia V.

Retrial: Instead, prosecutors called Kathleen Jenkins, a Canadian woman who alleged Masterson had drugged and raped her in 2000. Judge Olmedo allowed this testimony even though it had not been presented in the first trial.

These were the principal additions. The underlying testimony of the three charged accusers remained largely the same, but the prosecution's theory became substantially more forceful because it could:

explicitly characterize the incidents as involving drugging,

present expert context about Scientology to explain delayed reporting, and

introduce a different uncharged sexual assault witness whose allegations also involved alleged drugging.

Those changes became central issues in Masterson's subsequent appeal, with his attorneys arguing that the expanded evidence unfairly prejudiced the jury and should not have been admitted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100253)

Yeah he didn't do it. This is complete 100% fraudlies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100258)

https://cliffgardner.com/people_v_masterson_aob_v20250115.pdf

His appellate attorney is solid and very experienced.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50106334)

Wow I can see why you're a lawyer by trade. Good stuff

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100249)

That being said I literally believe he violently raped two women so 🤷

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100242)

Imagine going to trial with your life on the line and they go yeah we can't really prove this at all so we're just gonna have a random person take the stand and accuse you of rape. We have no idea who she is but it'll be key evidence against you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100259)

"Masterson began DJing at Los Angeles night clubs in 1997 as a hobby, under the name DJ Donkey Punch, but it soon became a side business. After Donkey Punch, he changed his name to DJ Donkey Pizzle, then DJ Mom Jeans by 2010.[22][23]"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5898477&forum_id=2ﾃ｢竄ï½���„1¤77PHPSESSID=3d8e678aec504db068978830e992758d#50100333)