\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Pentagon proposing "tactical nuke" in Iran, Trump mulling over:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/19/trump-caution-...
Angry opaque windowlicker
  06/19/25
Trump is not considering using a tactical nuclear weapon on ...
haunting domesticated headpube
  06/19/25
FOB?
Angry opaque windowlicker
  06/19/25
Is there any plan for containing the radiation leakage or do...
Coral Aphrodisiac Cruise Ship National Security Agency
  06/19/25
https://x.com/newswire_us/status/1935704570748903648?s=46
Coral Aphrodisiac Cruise Ship National Security Agency
  06/19/25
here in Brussels, it is rather straightforward that America ...
balding home jewess
  06/19/25
...
Angry opaque windowlicker
  06/21/25
careful what u wish for
balding home jewess
  06/21/25
...
;::;:;;::;;;;;::::
  03/31/26
...
Trust If Aryan
  03/30/26
...
lfo
  03/31/26
...
may his bones be crushed
  04/05/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2025 10:13 AM
Author: Angry opaque windowlicker

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/19/trump-caution-on-iran-strike-linked-to-doubts-over-bunker-buster-bomb-officials-say

Donald Trump has suggested to defense officials it would make sense for the US to launch strikes against Iran only if the so-called “bunker buster” bomb was guaranteed to destroy the critical uranium enrichment facility at Fordow, according to people familiar with the deliberations.

Trump was told that dropping the GBU-57s, a 13.6-tonne (30,000lb) bomb would effectively eliminate Fordow but he does not appear to be fully convinced, the people said, and has held off authorizing strikes as he also awaits the possibility that the threat of US involvement would lead Iran to talks.

The effectiveness of GBU-57s has been a topic of deep contention at the Pentagon since the start of Trump’s term, according to two defense officials who were briefed that perhaps only a tactical nuclear weapon could be capable of destroying Fordow because of how deeply it is buried.

Trump is not considering using a tactical nuclear weapon on Fordow and the possibility was not briefed by defense secretary Pete Hegseth and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff Gen Dan Caine in meetings in the White House situation room, two people familiar with the matter said.

But the defense officials who received the briefing were told that using conventional bombs, even as part of a wider strike package of several GBU-57s, would not penetrate deep enough underground and that it would only do enough damage to collapse tunnels and bury it under rubble.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49031662)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2025 10:16 AM
Author: haunting domesticated headpube

Trump is not considering using a tactical nuclear weapon on Fordow and the possibility was not briefed by defense secretary Pete Hegseth and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff Gen Dan Caine in meetings in the White House situation room, two people familiar with the matter said.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49031669)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Angry opaque windowlicker

FOB?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49031675)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2025 10:18 AM
Author: Coral Aphrodisiac Cruise Ship National Security Agency

Is there any plan for containing the radiation leakage or does Trump just figure someone else will handle that part?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49031677)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2025 10:26 AM
Author: Coral Aphrodisiac Cruise Ship National Security Agency

https://x.com/newswire_us/status/1935704570748903648?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49031704)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2025 10:31 AM
Author: balding home jewess

here in Brussels, it is rather straightforward that America dropping a nuclear bomb on Iran is a distinct possibility in the future--is anyone going to protest this sheer insanity?

nuclear option:

https://www.afnwc.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Article/2074643/b-2-spirit/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49031719)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2025 8:15 PM
Author: Angry opaque windowlicker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49038279)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2025 8:22 PM
Author: balding home jewess

careful what u wish for

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49038304)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 6:43 AM
Author: ;::;:;;::;;;;;::::



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49782355)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 30th, 2026 1:04 PM
Author: Trust If Aryan



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49780741)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 2:37 AM
Author: lfo



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49782290)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 5th, 2026 9:06 PM
Author: may his bones be crushed



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740396&forum_id=2ГѓЖ’#49796461)