Cali Boomers "can't afford" to sell their houses
| violent naked circlehead | 04/08/26 | | diverse tantric dog poop | 04/09/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | Maize Excitant Lettuce Stain | 04/08/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | Mint goal in life | 04/09/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | violent naked circlehead | 04/08/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | Fuchsia Irradiated Lodge | 04/08/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | Lavender crackhouse | 04/08/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | claret motley parlor | 04/08/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | Stirring chestnut stage | 04/08/26 | | thriller regret goyim | 04/08/26 | | Lemon tanning salon associate | 04/08/26 | | metal gaping | 04/08/26 | | Opaque kitchen | 04/08/26 | | thriller regret goyim | 04/08/26 | | Fragrant trailer park | 04/08/26 | | Boyish Round Eye Place Of Business | 04/08/26 | | thriller regret goyim | 04/08/26 | | Aggressive territorial nursing home | 04/08/26 | | Boyish Round Eye Place Of Business | 04/08/26 | | thriller regret goyim | 04/08/26 | | Lemon tanning salon associate | 04/08/26 | | Red house | 04/08/26 | | Vermilion roast beef gas station | 04/08/26 | | Salmon sick institution | 04/09/26 | | diverse tantric dog poop | 04/09/26 | | trip volcanic crater hell | 04/09/26 | | Shimmering Provocative Public Bath | 04/09/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 8th, 2026 2:24 PM Author: violent naked circlehead
https://www.sfgate.com/california/article/gains-taxes-california-housing-22183896.php
A lot of the ranting about Boomers on here is misplaced but this one I get. If it was just raw greed that would be one thing. But it's not. It's the cluelessness borne of growing up in a time of great prosperity and strong community, leading to catastrophic effects for others. And it's the panhandling for sympathy from a position of good fortune.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855071&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49804232) |
Date: April 8th, 2026 2:25 PM Author: Aggressive territorial nursing home
"It's the cluelessness borne of growing up in a time of great prosperity and strong community, leading to catastrophic effects for others."
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855071&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49804234) |
Date: April 8th, 2026 2:25 PM Author: Aggressive territorial nursing home
"And it's the panhandling for sympathy from a position of good fortune."
Boomers are 180
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855071&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49804235) |
 |
Date: April 8th, 2026 2:54 PM Author: claret motley parlor
yes and no, you keep the original house tax base, but still pay additional property tax on the DIFFERENCE in market value
e.g. purchase home for 500k
sell home for 1m and buy new home for 1.5m
transfer 500k + 500k, new tax basis is 1m
we kept our san jose home (650k purchase price, 1.5m market value) as a rental as it's the only way we'd be able to afford to move back to ca in the future. either we move back to that home, or 55+ we can sell it and buy a new home and transfer the tax basis
unfortunately, from a retirement perspective, ca feels risky from an income tax perspective and potential 'wealth/inheritance' tax
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855071&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49804378) |
Date: April 8th, 2026 2:56 PM Author: Fragrant trailer park
the article mentions straighforward ways around this like renting to family, renting + 1031, and death + stepped up basis.
it's also more annoying but the ladder approach of moving every 5-15 years to cash in on 500k in tax free gains each time can work too
it's 95% a psychological barrier
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855071&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49804392) |
Date: April 9th, 2026 6:23 AM Author: Salmon sick institution
What is the point of this article?
Selling the house just to move residence is probably net negative even without capital gains tax
"For example, if a California home was purchased for $500,000 and sells for $4 million today, that homeowner would likely owe around $1 million in taxes"
Now imagine the taxes owed on $3.5 million income in 1 year
Also this cuts worse the other way and makes the housing market less favorable to buyers than old sellers from lower inventory and higher demand for shittier overpriced new constructions
Is the author suggesting to eliminate any capital gains tax on primary residence? I seriously don't understand the point of this
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855071&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49805952)
|
|
|