kav concurred but dissented from going beyond statutory interp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49970952)

Not having the character to strike this down is incredibly shameful. At the end of the day, these guys are all human beings, and human beings have free will to choose to do the right thing. And they are too cowardly and weak. Very pathetic

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49970963)

Didn't think they'd be so explicit that Congress can do it. 180. Could be a big issue in the midterms and 2028. Not very many people agree with birthright as a policy. It's ridiculous.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49970953)

Are you retarded?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971004)

We call those people, "RACIST PIECES OF SHIT"

Today, SCOTUS made them eat shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971003)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971194)

What people don't seem to realize is that the Ponzi economy and asset prices are propped up by immigration because immigration is how they are increasing consumer demand, and consumer demand is what props up the economy..

it's all about asset prices, so Congress is not going to do anything because Congress is paid by the rich people whose wealth is in assets. Rich shareholders and so forth..

and the Supreme Court Justices all of them except for maybe two are afraid of being seen as bad people by those of their own social class, which is the upper class, which is the class that owns assets, Which is the class whose wealth would plummet if immigration is not able to prop up the economy..

there's no way out of this.. it's going to continue on the same path. And it's basically a Mafia style bust out of the currency.. of the dollar

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49970973)

in particular Western Europe is basically luring immigrants to Western Europe through welfare benefits, which is what we are doing too as well but it's going to become more pronounced here.. also Western Europe is also going very easy on immigrants who do things like rape white virgins.. so basically they are implicitly telling prospective male immigrants in the third world that they too can come to Western Europe and live on welfare and rape white virgins with impunity..

I think that's going to become the case in America too although it's going to be more difficult because the prison industry cartel is going to want to get their hands on those people.. they need fodder for the prison industry complex.. but that's the basic dynamic in play, in both Western Europe and in america, is that the Ponzi economy asset prices are being propped up by consumer demand through immigration, and immigration is being ramped up through promising welfare benefits, and even applying different standard of laws to immigrants.. and basically it's kind of like a escalating ladder of immigration incentives. Welfare is a strong incentive, which is going to be increased as time goes on, another incentive is the relaxation of criminal penalties for immigrants which is already being done big time in Western Europe and being done here in America to a lesser degree, but that is also going to be escalated and ramped up as an incentive..

it's a race to the bottom as the Western economies are force-fed consumer demand through immigration like a goose being force-fed to fatten up their liver. It's the same thing here.. America and Western Europe are basically captive animals domestic animals being fattened up by debasing their own currency to provide incentives to gain more immigration from the third world

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971001)

So it's kind of like immigration provides a secondary benefit because the relaxation of the laws for raping as far as immigrant men concerned provides a population growth in babies from White virgins that would not have borne children until many years later if at all.. so basically the Western economies are Ponzi economies that are propped up by immigration and at least in part by implicitly approving and ignoring immigrant males raping white virgins and impregnating them.. f****** horrific scenario.. we're basically like some sort of domestic livestock for the Elites in Western Nations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971014)

https://www.ajc.com/news/2026/06/census-data-shows-georgia-continues-to-diversify/

Over the past five years, the state added more than half a million people, with over 40% of the new residents being Hispanic, 33% Black, and 20% Asian.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971010)

UUUUUNNGGGGGNNNHHHHH

fuck. . .I need to clean my keyboard now

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971008)

I agree with everything you're saying except for SCOTUS's motivations. They're not going to supersede Congress, and they're right not to. It's up to the people to elect those that will create good policy, not to hope and pray SCOTUS does it with no legal justification. And they wouldn't have any way to enforce it anyway. Congress and POTUS could just keep waving in illegals and declining to go after and deport illegals, as we've done for decades now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971013)

Why would anyone believe it's up to the Supreme Court to shape policy when even they do not believe it's their role?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971065)

As I said, even if SCOTUS did what you're hoping for, Congress and POTUS could just choose not to enforce the law, as it has already been doing for decades.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971149)

There's a reason people used to tar and feather motherfuckers, and it's not because they had special love for chickens

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971151)

What's really frustrating is how these people both think that Congress is irreparably broken but also some pen strokes from SCOTUS would fix things. If the government is as irrevocably broken as they say then SCOTUS (which is not accountable to the people and would have no reason buck the system they're also a branch) couldn't fix the problem. Change requires action from the people, whether that's voting or something more, but it's pathetic is stupid to sit around and whine about SCOTUS not doing it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971186)

The core idea of the revolution and the current form of our government is that the consent of the governed and, implicitly, the ability of the governed to determine how they are governed, is central to a fair, just, prosperous, and free society

"The people" deserve all the blame when the system doesn't work and all the responsibility for fixing it. That's axiomatic if you're not retarded and want a functioning system of government rather than a top-down command and control society. The good news: if you want a top-down command and control society, there is a wealth of nations you can move to and have precisely that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971138)

Not sure what's confusing, but my framing of "the people" seemed to me to be clearly referring to the electorate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971822)

it's another form of government oversight leading to government corruption leading to fraud and waste

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971110)

The last real chance at repairing The System came-and-went with Ron Paul. I love Trump in many ways, but he wasn't going to Audit The Fed or anything of that nature. The Covid scam / financial system bailout happened under his watch, after all.

As you put it, the economy is a ponzi scheme reliant on endless growth in consumer demand and, increasingly, growth in ways to finance that demand. Post-2008 The System basically serves itself instead of functioning as the underpinnings of a healthy society wherein supply and demand are driven by Real Factors.

I sometimes watch videos on YouTube of interviews conducted with people in the distant past. Sometimes it's people in the early 1900s, sometimes it's in the Deep South in the 60s. And one thing I notice consistently is that people were much poorer, but were more free. They were not enslaved to debt and to a System that relies on the financialization of all human activity in order to continue working.

Others ITT are talking about how being here as a 3rd World Immigrant is much better for them than being in their home country because of all the welfare programs and what not. And sure, that may be true for the time being. But increasingly I think the West will see outflows of productive White people to some of these third world countries where they aren't forced to work on a treadmill to serve The System and can get by with less while also not being ruled over by increasingly parasitic "leaders." This may be more true for Europe. Whereas the US will increasingly see people sort themselves out across the States (and many already have.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971669)

The simpler and more defensible, modest, and straightforward holding was that the EO contravened the law, and there was no need to reach the constitutional issue.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49971403)

you really thought an EO could contravene the constitution or federal law? are you retards?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878551&forum_id=2ค1¤7PHPSESSID=188a95202f833e097d78c96d76bac3f6#49972225)