Cucumbers: explain the difference between white “boys” and black MEN
| The Penis | 04/25/26 | | cucumbers | 04/25/26 | | .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,.....,:,...:.:.,:.::,. | 04/25/26 | | cucumbers | 04/25/26 | | The Penis | 04/25/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 25th, 2026 7:44 AM Author: cucumbers
The difference is so enormous that they're basically different species. The BLACK MAN is the apex male with a BBC, at the very top of the food chain. He gets what he wants without trouble, and deservedly so. The white "man" is the lowest of the low, lingering beneath even Asian men in terms of dominance, raw sexual energy, etc. -- the white "man" is so submissive that he cannot achieve his flimsy "erection" (no match for even a flaccid BBC) outside the presence of a BLACK KING, who effuses raw masculinity and Black sexual energy. And even then, that white "man"'s tiny "erection" is a vestigial organ compared to a BBC -- it flops around as the white "man" bottoms for his BLACK KINGS. The white "man"'s orgasm is more like a woman's orgasm than anything else, involving squirting and a moist butthole. The BLACK KING, on the other hand, is a POWERFUL TOP who has enough submissive white "men" seeking his BLACK SEED that he doesn't have the slightest worry about his white bottom's pleasure -- the BLACK KING, after all, gets a broad selection of white "men" begging to be bred by his BBC. Filled up with BLACK SEED, the white "man" achieves temporary satisfaction before his inadequacy in society leads to inevitable depression.
This only scratches the surface -- I haven't even discussed how white "men" are absolute failures in dating and marriage because of the dominant force of an ordinary BBC drawing the full attention of white women.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5860340&forum_id=2#49841429) |
 |
Date: April 25th, 2026 7:45 AM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,.....,:,...:.:.,:.::,.
(peak Judaism)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5860340&forum_id=2#49841431) |
|
|