fiercer war: '90s console wars or current smartphone wars?
| boyish pervert hall | 10/26/12 | | mildly autistic scarlet principal's office | 10/26/12 | | erotic zombie-like piazza dysfunction | 10/26/12 | | Bipolar walnut state | 10/26/12 | | know-it-all set | 10/26/12 | | sinister national faggotry | 10/26/12 | | Mewling Round Eye | 10/26/12 | | Buck-toothed Soggy Electric Furnace Depressive | 10/26/12 | | Opaque cuckoldry | 10/26/12 | | Peter Brady | 05/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:00 AM Author: Buck-toothed Soggy Electric Furnace Depressive
Penis
/thread
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2#21889882) |
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:36 AM Author: Opaque cuckoldry
From the perspective of consumer engagement, the console wars were unrivaled. Back then, it was rare to have two consoles, and I remember kids arguing endlessly over the merits of each.
No one really cares about the differences between an iPhone and a Galaxy. One reason is that you don't really have to pay the full cost of your phone, and another is that these things get replaced about every year or two, unlike consoles which were a 5 year investment.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2#21889909) |
|
|