The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
UCLA or Boston College - Please Help!
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:11 PM Author: vigorous twisted persian hissy fit Subject: UCLA or Boston College ($$$)? Hi-
I would really appreciate some advice. I have two strange options and don't know what to do. I wanted to go to Michigan, but I've been dinged from their waistlist.
UCLA - Out of state tuition. Small possibility of becoming a resident. OR
Boston Colelge - with $10,000 a year in scholarships. Will equate to UCLA in year 2 if I become a California resident.
My goal is to work at a BigLaw firm out of law school and then eventually work as inhouse counsel at a pharma or biotech company. I believe I want to live on the East Coast: NYC, Boston, DC. I currently live in Boston and have connections with partners at McDermott Will & Emery, Foley Hoag, and Nutter. Does UCLA have such an advantage prestige-wise or national placement wise that it is worth moving and perhaps spending $30-40 k more overall?
Thanks!
|
 |
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:16 PM Author: brindle sexy property really tough guy UCLA is a top 15 school and about 10 spots higher in the rankings. Stop being a friggin troll.
UCLA is essentially equivalent to a Top 10 school on the West Coast due to enhanced regional prestige.
Furthermore, Boston?? Versus Southern California???
|
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:19 PM Author: cordovan territorial crackhouse I've got to think if you want to work in boston you would be better off taking BC over UCLA money or no money. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995050) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:23 PM Author: brindle sexy property really tough guy Oh, so firms stop looking at national rankings after the 14th school, do they now?
BC is ranked what 24?
Furthermore, you're advocating a regional school based upon the likelihood of settling down in a small, regional city?
UCLA is national, and also regionally stronger on the West Coast, which has legal markets in Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, Riverside, Palo Alto, San Francisco, as well as smaller cities.
California has 50% of the country's millionaires living there and has an economy which rivals that of countries.
You'd be a fool to choose BC over UCLA. |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:25 PM Author: Honey-headed degenerate Umm, no not quite, UCLA troll. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995119) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:27 PM Author: brindle sexy property really tough guy Sure. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995143) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:37 PM Author: Ivory gaming laptop UCLA is a borderline TTT although not quite a TTT like USC or vandy.
UCLA is NOT equivalent to t10 schools. This is nuts. UCLA is a safe net for t14 people. Even cornell is harder to get in than UCLA. Fucking douchetard |
|
Date: June 16th, 2006 9:43 AM Author: cracking internal respiration trailer park Completely false on all counts. The misinformation spread on this board is ridiculous. |
|
Date: June 16th, 2006 9:48 AM Author: cracking internal respiration trailer park UCLA Acceptance Rate: 16.1% Cornell Acceptance Rate: 20.6% GPA/ LSATs are nearly identical for both. htfh. http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index.php/1/asc/Accept
|
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:28 PM Author: cordovan territorial crackhouse Firms dont look at the national rankings at all, they hire people from the schools of the lawyers who are already at the firm.
Search, say ropes and gray's boston office and compare the number of BC people (30ish) to UCLA people (0). |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:30 PM Author: brindle sexy property really tough guy By student choice.
You're advocating a regional school based upon the likelihood of settling down in a small, regional city?
UCLA is national, and also regionally stronger on the West Coast, which has legal markets in Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, Riverside, Palo Alto, San Francisco, as well as smaller cities.
California has 50% of the country's millionaires living there and has an economy which rivals that of countries.
You'd be a fool to choose BC over UCLA.
|
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:31 PM Author: Honey-headed degenerate So...because they have lots of millionaires, its a good place to work. Okay bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995186) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:34 PM Author: brindle sexy property really tough guy "So...because they have lots of millionaires, its a good place to work. Okay bro."
HAHAHAHA. You're dumb. |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:36 PM Author: Honey-headed degenerate Explain. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995251) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:36 PM Author: cordovan territorial crackhouse He wants to live in boston. He also mentioned NYC, UCLA has 6 people at Skadden New York, BC has 16, etc etc. Look at the GTO emplyment study. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995246) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:54 PM Author: brindle sexy property really tough guy SKADDEN
New York UCLA - 9 (not 6) Boston College - 16
D.C. Boston College - 5 UCLA - 5
Los Angeles UCLA - 32 Boston College - 2
San Francisco/ Palo Alto UCLA - 10 Boston College - 1
htfh
(P.S.: Lack of east coast pwn3ge is likely due to student self-selection.) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:20 PM Author: Honey-headed degenerate BC all the way. No question about it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995059) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:25 PM Author: vibrant anal psychic ask the partners you know what they think. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995112) |
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:20 PM Author: lavender knife i don't feel like posting useful information in this thread. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995060) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:22 PM Author: Scarlet rehab shitlib This was probalby the best post of the day. I had similar thoughts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995092) |
|
Date: June 15th, 2006 5:29 PM Author: lavender knife ty. congrats on cornell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5995163) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2006 9:38 AM Author: vigorous twisted persian hissy fit Subject: Still need help: BC v. UCLA A question to the posters-
Do you come from the respective schools?
How important is school representation at a firm in getting an interview and a job?
The Boston firms tell me to go to BC. But I'm not sure I want to do BigLaw forever. Like I said, I'd like to work on inhouse counsel |
|
Date: June 16th, 2006 9:41 AM Author: cracking internal respiration trailer park You're obviously afraid to leave your gumba friends out on the East Coast. My advice to you: stay there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=435406&forum_id=2#5999949) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2006 9:40 AM Author: cracking internal respiration trailer park Skadden Los Angeles Placement:
Duke: 1
Northwestern: 4
Cornell: 7
UCLA: 33 (*1 misfiled under U. Chicago)
USC: 7 :-(
Harvard: 15
Yale: 3
Stanford: 9
Columbia: 9
NYU: 13
UVA: 2
Chicago: 0 (1 misfiled, U. Chicago undergrad only)
Michigan: 3
Boalt: 3 :-(
Georgetown: 4
omg omg, buh buh buh GTO's study... buh buh buh
I hope this helps.
www.skadden.com
|
|
Date: June 16th, 2006 9:40 AM Author: cracking internal respiration trailer park IRELL PLACEMENT
Yale: 16
Virginia: 3
USC: 18
UCLA: 24
Stanford: 8
Georgetown: 4
Harvard: 29
Michigan: 3
NYU: 4
Penn: 4
Northwestern: 2
Boalt: 20
Chicago: 10
Cornell: 1
Columbia: 14
Duke: 4
Georgetown: 4
Steep dropoff after the T6. Steep.
*Strong* west coast prestige (USC, UCLA).
omg, omg omg omg. buh buh buh, GTO, the study. buh buh
www.irell.com
|