The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The plain jane manhattan girl gave me props again
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:03 AM Author: Erotic multi-billionaire site Superstar! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=519476&forum_id=2#6924282) |
 |
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:05 AM Author: Domesticated cordovan address roast beef huh? at least the other attention whores don't post obscure references. |
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:05 AM Author: lascivious green senate But J. is so deep!*
*By deep, I mean poor and manish. |
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:08 AM Author: Erotic multi-billionaire site Pardon me?
I was referring to this: http://plainjanejonesmanhattan.blogspot.com/
I thought it was well known enough at this point. I'm on a personal crusade against her and her kind.
|
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:21 AM Author: Domesticated cordovan address roast beef j. don't waste your time on this piece of genetic material. I read a page worth -- she's a humorless retard who thinks she's the ultimate in coolness. She ANALYSES THE BACHELOR for christ's sake. EDIT: I see she's overreacting to a column published in the Daily Mail -- a stupid brit tabloid aimed at stupid brits. she must be one of those provincial anglophile retards who thinks everything british is better than anything american. |
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:25 AM Author: Erotic multi-billionaire site I like unlikeable people to know they're unlikeable. It drives me up the wall when people seem ignorant of their own flaws. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=519476&forum_id=2#6924416) |
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:28 AM Author: Domesticated cordovan address roast beef now she just thinks you criticise her bc you envy her coolness. there is no penetrating such a thick skull as hers. you could try mocking her -- she might dimly perceive that as criticism. |
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 1:31 AM Author: Erotic multi-billionaire site Maybe you're right.
I managed to rattle womanontop, I think, recently. Maybe I should just be content with that and move on to learning how to juggle. |
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 8:35 AM Author: Laughsome church building Perhaps, but maybe she just stumbled upon that article and decided to blog about it. It appeared to gather the kind of response that the Forbes article gathered here in the States, so maybe that caused her to blog about it. She seems much more like a provincial feminist retard than a provincial anglophile retard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=519476&forum_id=2#6925638) |
|
Date: November 5th, 2006 8:22 AM Author: Laughsome church building Wow, you're obsessed. It's pretty pathetic. If you don't like her, don't waste your time with trying to get her to realize how unlikeable she is. Chances are she doesn't care about how unlikeable she comes across to you (or to anyone). I still think a lot of her posts are geared to elicit a certain response from people. Not all her posts are cunty; she actually hasn't been that bad recently. Her only cunty posts were her "point spread" post and any of her posts criticizing people who live in regions of the country she finds undesirable.
Her pussy theorem was actually pretty funny. |
Date: November 5th, 2006 8:37 AM Author: Gold codepig digit ratio How come no one ever talks about smart successful women and whether they prefer smart men vs. a "nice, good looking guy who works in the marketing department at ESPN"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=519476&forum_id=2#6925639) |